Archived No Studies Show 5G Is Safe. Satellites Being Sent Into Space To Blast Earth With It Anyway. (activistpost.com)
submitted ago by madmalloy
Posted by: madmalloy
Posting time: 1.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/7/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 357
SCP: 44
49 upvotes, 5 downvotes (91% upvoted it)
Archived No Studies Show 5G Is Safe. Satellites Being Sent Into Space To Blast Earth With It Anyway. (activistpost.com)
submitted ago by madmalloy
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Neo-maxi-zoom-dweeby ago
You are awash in electromagnetic radiation all the time. There has never been a time in your life that you have not been. But there are no radio or cell frequencies that are narrow enough to cause biological activity. Microwaves don't even penetrate past the surface and those only heat by quickly oscillating the polarity of the field - causing water molecules to flip back and forth.
But NONE of that is relevant to cell towers. The whole idea is preposterous and speaks to a real ignorance about what this technology is.
I am sure you can find anecdotes for everything and RT articles or nature news articles. But none of them have a plausible testable hypothesis for what these low frequency bands could do and the claims being made fly in the face of physics.
[–] badruns ago (edited ago)
You're retarded - signal strength is an inverse square relationship.
No shit, but there's a big difference between the sun which is millions of miles away and spending 9+ hours a day 15 feet directly underneath a transmission tower.
[–] Neo-maxi-zoom-dweeby ago (edited ago)
The energy coming out of those towers is no stronger than a street light. But it does not matter how close it is - the wavelength of the highest energy band is 3mm. That is WAY too big to interact with chemical bonds or interfere with any biological processes. Compare that to UVB which has a wavelength of 320 to 400 nm - which is small enough to interfere with any place along the DNA strand that has two thymine bases in a row. Those light frequencies are sufficient to generate oxygen free radicals - but this is all millions of times smaller than the wavelength of 5G.
So it does not matter how much energy you dump into a transmitter at anywhere from 3 to 90 ghz - its not going cause any biological responses. I think you should look at the evidence offered in support of that hypothesis with more skepticism. You might want to attempt to look for verification or at least understand what mechanism they are offering as the possible response. What was shown that i have seen does not lend me confidence about their claims.