Archived No Studies Show 5G Is Safe. Satellites Being Sent Into Space To Blast Earth With It Anyway. (activistpost.com)
submitted ago by madmalloy
Posted by: madmalloy
Posting time: 1.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/7/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 357
SCP: 44
49 upvotes, 5 downvotes (91% upvoted it)
Archived No Studies Show 5G Is Safe. Satellites Being Sent Into Space To Blast Earth With It Anyway. (activistpost.com)
submitted ago by madmalloy
view the rest of the comments →
[–] qwop 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Lack of studies is not a criteria for safety. Studies are done to determine safety limits. If there are no studies, there are no valid safety limits. If there are no valid safety limits, you're flying blind.
The industry is doing no testing to determine 5G safety limits, and the studies they've used for older generation systems are outdated and not done within the 5G frequency spectrum. But it's ok. We'll just trust they know what they're doing.
[–] BlueDrache 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Nor is lack of studies a qualification for it being dangerous.
Show me a reputable study from something other than a fly-by-night bullshit blog conspiritard website and I'll consider it.
Until then, shut up.
[–] qwop 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
That is not the point of the article. The industry is refusing to do ANY studies at all on specifically 5G. Would you be willing to step onto an airplane that was never tested for airworthiness?
Please explain to me your reasoning. Do you support putting possible pollutants into the environment, without any testing for safety or harm? I genuinely want to understand your thought process here.
[–] qwop 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago (edited ago)
Former senior toxicologist Ronald Melnick, Ph.D., from the National Institute of Health says the following:
Key findings from the $30 million NTP cell phone study:
Ronald Melnick's presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyrdQE503Sc
1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers on Electromagnetic Fields and Biology or Health:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view
Overview of 67 studies ranked by power density with observed effects, compared to current safety standards:
https://i.imgur.com/14uxRru.png
Some fun picks:
Effects of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Signal Exposure on Brain Glucose Metabolism:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892/
The human skin as a sub-THz receiver:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29459303
Electromagnetic radiation exposure causes cognition deficit with mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in rats:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/29872015/
Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
Frontal and temporal lobe Glioma rates in the UK since 1995:
https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/de-vocht-response.jpg
I await your response.