You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
3

[–] Tb0n3 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

No studies show it's NOT safe.

2
0

[–] DishingShitLikeA 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Next up... Asbestos! The wonder mineral!

1
2

[–] Tb0n3 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Gotta be careful around that dihydrogen monoxide. Sure there's no studies showing it's dangerous, but with a name like that you know it's just causing all kinds of cancer.

1
-1

[–] qwop 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Lack of studies is not a criteria for safety. Studies are done to determine safety limits. If there are no studies, there are no valid safety limits. If there are no valid safety limits, you're flying blind.

The industry is doing no testing to determine 5G safety limits, and the studies they've used for older generation systems are outdated and not done within the 5G frequency spectrum. But it's ok. We'll just trust they know what they're doing.

1
2

[–] BlueDrache 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Nor is lack of studies a qualification for it being dangerous.

Show me a reputable study from something other than a fly-by-night bullshit blog conspiritard website and I'll consider it.

Until then, shut up.