You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
4

[–] Diggernicks 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

If it IS safe whats the problem?

Where's the studies that show it isn't safe?

1
2

[–] qwop 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Diggernicks I know you like to troll these posts, but I hope you'll never be in charge of setting safety standards for anything. A lack of studies you see, is not proof of safety. This should be basic common sense.

What we have instead are numerous papers showing harm from frequencies in the 3G and 4G ranges. Therefore there is in fact no reason to assume 5G is any safer. Safety has to be tested, that us how safety standards are created. Just putting your head in the sand is not a valid strategy for this.

0
0

[–] GapingAnus ago 

lack of studies you see, is not proof of safety

Nor is a lack of studies proof of danger. Where are the studies that indicate danger for the frequency ranges and relevant power levels. Do note the inverse square law wrt. cell towers and especially sats.

We have known for decades to be a bit careful with anything above the 70cm band but transmission power matters hugely here. So where are the studies for the wattages that will be relevant?

1
0

[–] BlueDrache 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

In the conspiritard head, that is it.