Archived No Studies Show 5G Is Safe. Satellites Being Sent Into Space To Blast Earth With It Anyway. (activistpost.com)
submitted ago by madmalloy
Posted by: madmalloy
Posting time: 1.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/7/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 357
SCP: 44
49 upvotes, 5 downvotes (91% upvoted it)
Archived No Studies Show 5G Is Safe. Satellites Being Sent Into Space To Blast Earth With It Anyway. (activistpost.com)
submitted ago by madmalloy
Sort: Top
[–] Diggernicks 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago (edited ago)
If it IS safe whats the problem?
Where's the studies that show it isn't safe?
[–] qwop 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
Diggernicks I know you like to troll these posts, but I hope you'll never be in charge of setting safety standards for anything. A lack of studies you see, is not proof of safety. This should be basic common sense.
What we have instead are numerous papers showing harm from frequencies in the 3G and 4G ranges. Therefore there is in fact no reason to assume 5G is any safer. Safety has to be tested, that us how safety standards are created. Just putting your head in the sand is not a valid strategy for this.
[–] GapingAnus ago
Nor is a lack of studies proof of danger. Where are the studies that indicate danger for the frequency ranges and relevant power levels. Do note the inverse square law wrt. cell towers and especially sats.
We have known for decades to be a bit careful with anything above the 70cm band but transmission power matters hugely here. So where are the studies for the wattages that will be relevant?
[–] BlueDrache 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
In the conspiritard head, that is it.
[–] iamlegion 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Good thing psyop faggots, ex intel faggots, and every other lame brained faggots don't do real research.
A) Cryptological Aspects of ESP; https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/nsa-rdp96x00790r000100030008-7
CIA declassified document of an NSA document—
Outlines predecessors to ionization and radiation dosing—
Outlines predecessors to war theatre and false flags—
Outlines predecessors to using stress as a tool—
Outlines predecessors to using pharmacology as a tool—
Outlines predecessors to using GeoEngineering to block/excite/track adepts
B) Torture, targeted stalking is equal to or greater than the existence of the Foundlings https://imgur.com/a/u2b1Isw Album appearances AND abductions;
lead us to surmise that we are being harvested, bread, or kidnapped for the explicit intent of making children evolve their latent abilities. ie., -- Druish practices -- Occult Arts (devolving into 'satanism') -- occult and secrete schools appearing and disappearing periodically -- and persian sex cults persisting into pedophilia, homosexuality, and trans-humanism
C) H.R. 2977 https:/ /www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/2977/text
Section 7 / B This bill is aimed at clearly defining space as a clear zone from these weapons, while stating the bill does NOT exclude their current usages https://imgur.com/a/rrpdqYN Album
I submit that A, B, C are part of the same program(s) which have been disguised as a benefit when in-fact, they are seek and destroy, or seek and control mechanisms on all humans on any landmass, bodies of water, or air space.
Weapons in section B are currently deployed and disguised as commercial products under the guidance of the CIA and NSA and used as a conquer and control mechanism against personal agency or group initiative.
NOTE: this would benefit from seasoned PG researchers offering correlations or refuting claims where needed, however, this one document does represent the polestar for many of the technologies and social issues you are all investigating.
———————
Bonus material:
I should note, for reference, as it relates to religious people and their practices/myths:
If you have been brutalized, raped, beaten senseless, molested, tortured or —worse?;
A collection of lamentations from Dumuzid entitled "In the Desert by The Early Grass" describes;
Consider the Vatican Church's statue/installation, positioned behind the Pope. This would be the church the ED from OuterDark clearly indicates is a snake head (Horned Viper? Oldest family line?).
The Statue reflects this story, and the process of ritual abuse used to create "adepts" or "gifted" ones. The anointed one is an allusion to what they do their "adepts" once spotted or identified—if they try to be "good"
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-KSOxOirh0NU/TqnNF-Wgg4I/AAAAAAAACn0/HeMplWHl5RQ/s640/Pope%252C+Cardinals.jpgJPG
Does this look like Christ, or a replication of the story of Damu? I don't think "good" has ever existed and anyone who actually believes in good; are dealt with like this in order to avoid a contagion into their 'ancient' rites and methods. And as a part of the greater alchemical principles of energy, thought-transference, esp, psi—whatever you want to call it, fear will always draw our attentions elsewhere and into a void of our own self-making.
We have it backwards. And that is why we always lose.
I have permission to share OP's original work. https://voat.co/v/technology/3119283
[–] Toroidal 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
The Sun does the same thing. That being said, wear your UV protection.
[–] qwop 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago (edited ago)
Does sunlight pass through opaque materials?
Can sunlight penetrate deep into opaque substances, and interact with matter inside them?
Now what about microwaves?
Figure out the answer to those questions, and you will understand why the sun does not do the same thing.
[–] Toroidal 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
The sun emits frequencies in the 5G range, yes.
[–] Tb0n3 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
No studies show it's NOT safe.
[–] DishingShitLikeA 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Next up... Asbestos! The wonder mineral!
[–] Tb0n3 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Gotta be careful around that dihydrogen monoxide. Sure there's no studies showing it's dangerous, but with a name like that you know it's just causing all kinds of cancer.
[–] qwop 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Lack of studies is not a criteria for safety. Studies are done to determine safety limits. If there are no studies, there are no valid safety limits. If there are no valid safety limits, you're flying blind.
The industry is doing no testing to determine 5G safety limits, and the studies they've used for older generation systems are outdated and not done within the 5G frequency spectrum. But it's ok. We'll just trust they know what they're doing.
[–] BlueDrache 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Nor is lack of studies a qualification for it being dangerous.
Show me a reputable study from something other than a fly-by-night bullshit blog conspiritard website and I'll consider it.
Until then, shut up.
[–] Neo-maxi-zoom-dweeby 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
There is no radio frequency that has enough energy to have biological impact. This fear of 5G is moronic.
[–] badruns ago (edited ago)
Yeah, that school in California where 4 kids and 3 teachers got cancer from the cell tower on the top of the school were just making things up. Also the NYC firemen who reported concentration and memory problems until the towers at their stations were removed were just imagining things. Also the reports of these cell phone tower workers experiencing infertility for weeks until they ceased working at the towers were lies. Also this study in particular should be ignored
It's almost as if they do cause issues depending on the strength of the signal...
I can get people not being knowledgeable about a topic, but what I don't understand why people who have done literally no research on the topic just parrot the MSM's narrative like they're experts.
[–] Neo-maxi-zoom-dweeby ago
You are awash in electromagnetic radiation all the time. There has never been a time in your life that you have not been. But there are no radio or cell frequencies that are narrow enough to cause biological activity. Microwaves don't even penetrate past the surface and those only heat by quickly oscillating the polarity of the field - causing water molecules to flip back and forth.
But NONE of that is relevant to cell towers. The whole idea is preposterous and speaks to a real ignorance about what this technology is.
I am sure you can find anecdotes for everything and RT articles or nature news articles. But none of them have a plausible testable hypothesis for what these low frequency bands could do and the claims being made fly in the face of physics.
[–] ShadowWatcher ago
I fly fpv drones, we use 5.8 gigahertz to relay video back to our headsets. I don't know of anyone who has flown over three miles away without use of a ground station, which is a highly boosted antenna for lack of better words. The point is, the range of 5G is not very far, why would they put 5G up in space? You would need another station roughly every 3 miles till the signal got to the ground. Kind of like a ladder of antennas. This is just what I have found from using it, if we could fly further than that away, trust me we would!
[–] Pollycracker ago
Brussels bans 5G. If it's not good enough for the New World Order it should not be good enough for the USA.
[–] PathogenAlpha 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Sending those satelites into orbit is an act of war.
India, Russia, China, and other countries out there will not allow those 5G units to take up stationary orbit around the planet.
We are going to see missiles being sent up into orbit to destroy those units..