You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
3

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Uhh, no straw man, here. Maybe you should look up what a straw man is:

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.

If a person thinks 9/11 needs thousands of people to be done, that person can't also believe the official story. Work it out in your head.

3
-3

[–] Oh_Well_ian [S] 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago  (edited ago)

yes.. your comment about 20 hijackers ( it was 19 ) does not relate to my post, whatsoever.

The post implies 5200 Pentagon staffers walking around with child porn presents a clear case for widespread blackmail. Btw, why was the investigation dropped not once, but TWICE ?

19 hijackers absolutely did not pull off 9/11... for fuck sake, how did everyone suddenly assume amateurs can fly jumbo jets like Chuck Yeager?

Work it out in your head >> you wrongly assumed the point the submission was making, added a comment about 20 hijackers in broken and unclear English, and then dug in your heals on your stupidity.

'Oh, I get what you were saying now, 5200 people at the Pentagon could have been blackmailed into helping pull of the 9/11 False Flag' << what the fuck would be so difficult about saying that?

1
1

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Did you read your own title? It's self-contradictory on the face of it.

How did 20 Saudis execute 9/11 if it takes "THOUSANDS" to do it?