[–] [deleted] 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
9

[–] bikergang_accountant 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

But that's what /v/conspiracy is for. It's for unconfirmed things that have some probability of being true. Before something is fully confirmed it is still worth discussion. After all, all confirmed things are the product of probable things being discussed by someone even if by probable we mean less than 50%.

Saying that only confirmed things can be discussed is a form of censorship. Maybe news organizations should be the only ones able to discuss allegations and they will release them only after confirmation or whenever they feel like it. That doesn't introduce a system of abuse at all.

0
3

[–] peacegnome 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Then link to the actual email on wikileaks, or an archive of the shitty site as a last resort. What was added by the site was a shitty clickbait headline, and a comment that was of lower quality than something found on voat.

0
2

[–] sinjinsmythe 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not much else to say about this, you nailed it. If the site has more ads than article, you can pretty much guarantee it is bs.

0
1

[–] WhiteRonin 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

True but this is v/conspiracy and recently this sub is hitting rather well with our shit predictions.

As MIB the movie out it, there is truth in even in the national enquirer!

0
1

[–] InfidelAl 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

While I agree with you, this IS posted in "conspiracy"...

0
5

[–] Boyakasha 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Considering that Rupert Murdoch attends fund raisers for hilldogg, it wouldn't surprise me at all. They're establishment-first, through and through.

0
2

[–] 6365109? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Which is why the recent report of HW Bush planning to vote for Hillary doesn't surprise me (or wouldn't surprise me if it were true). These bastards don't give a rip for the country.

0
2

[–] MCVoat 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So it says they've infiltrated their teams, not that each is individually an operative.

0
0

[–] heygeorge 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The conclusion this 'article' draws is beyond specious. After reading the email chain (and some more about Pablo), this is conflation at its worst. Clearly the upvoats are just for wanting it to be true and to spread easily dismissed narrative.

0
0

[–] Deplorable_Me 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That smug faced Megan Kelly needs a cunt punt.

0
0

[–] RedLeader 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Maddox is a long con shill too I bet. He flip flops on the SJW narrative between podcasts and YouTube.

0
1

[–] Superchexx 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

He's very obviously a narcissist that still wants to be seen as both edgy and not -ist

0
0

[–] RedLeader 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I remember hearing his name out of the blue one day many years ago and it came from some news article linked possibly from Reddit, and it was sucking his dick claiming how everyone listens to him. It was funny but I didn't need Maddox to tell me PS3 was shit aside from like two games to know that. He's fishy as fuck now.