You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Sciency ago 

they will need a huge injection of cash and manpower to fix all the issues that are coming up.

And they'll get it too, this is nintendo and google after all. If it has potential for being a moneymaker (and it could be a huge one) they wont let this go away. Maybe they'll treat this as a beta, and release a new app in several months. PGo is the first true proof of concept and viability for augmented reality gaming. After this, it might not be a pokemon game, but the results will be the same.

0
0

[–] Jackbiscuit ago 

Its not a very good game, really. You can't battle pokemon you're attempting to catch, you only battle pokemon that hold the same stats as what the trainer has at a gym, which you may need to pump $5 or $10 into it to beat a given gym. The pokemon is simply rendered ontop of a picture taken by your phones camera.

Just like a quad core processor or any multicore processor, the hardware isn't fully utilized to even be viably branded augmented reality. They have virtual headset hardware, sure, but they still cannot fully utilize the capability of an i7 processor let alone render a good 30+ frames per second 3d image through two seperate small high resolution OLED screens.