You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

3
1

[–] mirimar 3 points 1 point (+4|-3) ago 

If they can show me a population who has no vaccs and are better off ,healthier , stronger then their argument would at least have some validity. But they can't. Because they are wrong. It is that simple.

0
8

[–] SomeoneOnTheInternet 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

You do know that no studies exist where they compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated for any meaningful amounts of time. I wonder why that is...

3
-2

[–] mirimar 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Gee, I guess the eradication of smallpox is even not enough to convince you of the benefits of vaccines. Take a good read of what that disease did to people. I pity you and all you teach your nonsense too.

1
3

[–] fr33europe 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

I think it's a bit more complex.

I have no doubt that vaccines work. I also have no doubt that vaccines can have unintended side effects. This could be from any number of factors, whether by design, improper storage, administration, screw ups, etc.

I personally eat as close to Paleo as possible, which means I very closely monitor what goes into my body.

The question is, should I by law be told what to inject into my bloodstream? Or my kids for that matter?

If the government was so obsessed with keeping my kids healthy, consumption of Coke would be illegal and so would half the shit at the grocery store.

I strongly feel that the only reason this is such a big issue is the pharma lobbyists pushing an agenda. Not health concerns