You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 5496682? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No, but I'm paranoid about shills - Voat has a shit ton of shills. There's the possibility that discounting the attack as a false-flag is an attempt to defuse the Muslim connection and turn it into Government paranoia. Then again Voat loves to hate the Government so it could easily gain traction here. Still, your post is interesting in that context.

0
1

[–] SLCLocal [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for the explanation. Admittedly, I have dragged my feet in making the changeover. Being banned on Reddit was the final straw. Was hoping that this was a place to exchange ideas about this incident.

I'm certainly not a shill; but I didn't know that I'd be attacked for questioning the narrative that we are given. I guess I'll read around and try to figure out what is acceptable to post.

Thanks again!

0
0

[–] 5496786? ago 

Everything is acceptable in Voat, including questioning 6 minute old accounts. Please don't be offended, or think I was trying to offend you. That's the beauty of Voat. Speak freely.