This climate model.
Under the auspice of conservation of energy, climate alarmist have created this model.
What that model actually represents is a flat earth under a frozen sun.
They have taken the suns energy and divided it by 4 and spread it over the entire surface area of the earth at once. Making it a useless model with no basis in reality whatsoever.
When the sun actually hits one hemisphere at a time and has a focal point of energy where the sunlight is most intense.
That would be like cooking a turkey at 1/4 the temperature for 4x as long and expecting the same results, ridiculous.
This is what the model should look like, if you want to draw any conclusions that will actually play out in reality.
Basically they've removed the ability for the sun to create the climate, which is what actually happens, and concocted this pseudo science were the earth's climate creates itself. The earth somehow gets hotter(has more energy) than the heat(energy) provided. If that were the case actual greenhouses would also demonstrate this runaway heating feedback loop. A greenhouse can not have more energy than the sun provides. This is taught in every college, complete junk science.
They stole the name green house because what happens in a green house has nothing to do with their made up greenhouse effect. (check out bonus vid at the bottom)
If you want to understand more watch this. It's Canadian astrophysicists Joseph Postma explaining that there is no such thing as a radiative greenhouse effect.
Also Watch Dr. Willie Soon to learn more about the IPCC and the fake political science that has infested the field.
Carbon is one of the 3 main ingredients for life. When there is more C02 in the air life is more abundant and stronger. We breath it out with every breath.
Their climate GHE should be able to be experimentally confirmed in real greenhouses, but it isn’t. This is an empirical disproof. 2) Their climate GHE necessitates recycling and reverse flow of heat, which is of course a violation of theory. Hence it is theoretically invalid which goes with the empirical disproof. 3) The origin of their climate GHE is in their flat Earth models where the Sun cannot create the climate, and thus their GHE is then postulated to make up for what their flat Earth cold sunshine cannot do in such a model. In reality of course the Sun does do it all, but their empirically invalid starting point for deriving their GHE explains why they then run into the theoretical problems as above which of course has its own lack of empirical support.
Answer this, in a actual green house being hit by 960 W/m^2 (88°c) will the inside of the green house exceed 88°c?
An ice cube emits 240wm^2, boiling water emits over 1000wm^2.
If you add the 240wm^2 ice to boiling water, what happens to the energy of the water?
Does it get hotter or colder?
According to that model the water would get hotter! Do not confuse energy and heat!
How an actual greenhouse works.
Postma's debunk of Skeptical Science
A Breakdown I made to help people who can't understand the alarmist model.
Where do Climate Alarmist Numbers Come From?
Postma goes through some peer review by the American Meteorological Society.