We believe in ideology called ChadRight.
What is Chad-Right:
Chad-Right is an wide right-wing political ideology of personal growth for greater good of your ethno-cultural group, practised through means such as:
Nofap and fighting drug/alcohol/internet addiction
Working out
Networking with fellow Chad-Righters
Political and ideological activism
Meditations
Martial arts
Education and earning money
etc.
In Chad-Right we believe that the smartest, the strongest and the most powerful units have much greater influence of world’s politics than masses. One example of this rule existing in reality are Jews that despite being minority have vast influence on current world.
Movement’s purposes are recruiting people, changing them into successful units and deploying them in different areas of control to induce world in the way it should be induced.
In simple words fellow internet-dweller that came upon this post: We want you to change you into real-life Chads in order to influence world’s politics.
FAQ:
Why should I join Chad-Right?
If you want to be part of actual change in the world, if you want to feel as part of something bigger than you are and if you want to make new friends that for once understand( and like) you.
Why should I believe you that Chad-Right may work as a real movement?
Because our methods work. Right now, chances are that you are pretty weak and miserable as a human. To weak to make a real change.
However, as a part of our group and even more; as a smarter, stronger, more disciplined version of yourself existing as a part of our group your power-level would be much higher.
Sort: Top
[–] Sitnikoff 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's sodomy.
God created human beings in His own image, and created them males and female. Therefore, men must be treated as men, and women must be treated as women.
In order for a non-transient marriage relationship to be fertile, it is required that both men and women adopt their natural God-ordained gender roles respectively in all facets of life including the social, the psychological, the spiritual and the sexual (etc.).
For a particularly extreme example, a sane man does not crave the semen of his wife, nor does a sane woman crave to ejaculate into her husband's pussy; neither do those cravings lead to successful bearing of children, because they operate in deviation from God's natural created order, a "crime against nature," the traditional and historical definition of sodomy.
More subtle of an example: A sane man does not crave to allow himself to be subjugated under his wife's authority when making decisions and relinquish all responsibility to her, nor does a sane woman crave to bear the responsibility of putting her life in the line to be the family's provider and leader; such cravings are destructive not only to both parties, but also to the psyche of those people's offspring, because those cravings too are expressions of deviancy against God's natural created order.
Similarly, homosexual acts operate in deviation from God's natural created order in the same way, but with different actions. As homosexual activity is sodomy, so is treating men as women and women as men is sodomy.
No.
Think about how a man and a women end up in a marriage relationship in the first place. One keyword is attraction ; as a sane man with cravings in alignment with God's Word naturally craves to marry and fuck a sane godly virgin girl of age who exudes the most intense expression of God-ordained feminine nature that he can find, so does a sane woman with craving in alignment with God's Word naturally craves to be married and be fucked by a sane godly man of age who exudes the most intense expression of God-ordained masculine nature that she can find.
Therefore, in order for the door of marriage opportunity to be open, a man must embrace his own God-given masculinity while simultaneously affirming the reality of femininity within all women in word and deed, just as a woman must embrace her own God-given femininity while simultaneously affirming the reality of masculinity within all men in word and deed.
Also, beyond the context of male-female relations, to reject such realities of the masculine in the mand an the feminine in the woman either in word or deed is dehumanizing, just as it would be to claim that a human being is a subhuman animal no greater than a rat or a pig.
In summation, I would suggest a revision to that caption to make it say, "does not worship women"
[–] Phantom42 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You lost me at "godly virgin".
They aren't real. Unless you have sexual habits you'd like to confess to...
[–] Sitnikoff ago (edited ago)
lurk moar, faggot.
There are tons of godly virgins out there; they're just hiding from the world system very well enough to only be found in insulated circles of strong biblical churches and their families.
[–] Diggernicks ago
Spoiler:He's a closet fag