[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Opinion The New York Times

I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration

I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. Sept. 5, 2018 https://archive.is/IPL8Q#selection-76.0-76.1

[–] kommisar6 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This story is garbage. It rehashes all the lefty incompetence porn in a single story. This porn only exists in the minds of lefties, not a purported conservative. Putting it all in one story does not make it more believable. Even if true, a conservative would never go public. They would keep working behind the scenes accomplishing the good things admitted by the story. Finally, a conservative would never praise John McCain. He is the embodiment of a uni-party RINO. Nope, this story is only intended to attack the president and stop his agenda. It was written by Sharia Blue.

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I suspect the "leak" was Trump authorized. Pretend yu are at your weakest when you are at your strongest...

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Times Publishes Anonymous Op-Ed From Member of ‘Resistance’ Within Administration. Trump Calls It ‘Gutless.’ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-anonymous-editorial.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The NY Times anonymous op-ed writer (if the traitor exists) will be identified - A National Security investigation has been instituted. https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1037512743925022721

[–] wonderfuldonut 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Lets see what the future holds. many claim multitude of things most without proof. A few screen captures and thats it they claim. fake, fraud and much more. Lets see what takes place over the next week

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Lets see what the future holds... Always jam tomorrow - over the next hill. Tuesday 9/11 could be a big day.

I feel the dam is about to burst - but the military courts don't seem to kick in until Jan 19

And yet I still look to MSM to confirm what is happening...

[–] wonderfuldonut 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

See its not about doubt, if it is or is not, the fact of the matter is the societal landscape has changed regardless. Once the Genie is out of the bottle it tends to be hard to get it back in.

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

10 REASONS QANON MIGHT BE REAL (2018) Decagon TV 13 Aug 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8GVeLXu3o8&feature=youtu.be

Eye the Spy at the last rally https://twitter.com/RealEyeTheSpy/status/1037486046563459073

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

@26 mins - Kavanagh Military Law v Criminal Law https://youtu.be/Tocc8EolxXg?t=1558

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey testifies before U.S. House Committee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbEbjKWRsgc 4h - seems to miss a bit at the beginning...

Maybe wait for the highlights!

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Jack Dorsey tops Sheryl Sandberg as tech’s DC rep https://reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1LL2W6

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This seems to start at the beginning - Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg and Twitter’s Jack Dorsey Testify Before https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWGGNJaD46c

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

2093

https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/?q=case#2 Mockingbird

What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._Eisentrager [this seems to deal exclusively with aliens - not citizens]

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/339/763.html

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld#Stevens'_opinion_for_the_Court

Having read some Hamdan, it doesn't appear to endorse military commissions for civilians on the grounds that commissions don't give the same trial protections as civilian courts - I think the EO re military tribunals rectifies this - but don't take my word for it - I have found the whole military tribunal thing confusing from the get go.

I'm not persuaded that these cases are the keys to the Military tribunals for citizen enemies domestic (traitors)]

But Kavanagh, prospective Supreme Court Judge seemed to think they were...

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Hamdi v Rumsfeld

This seems closer - deals with an American citizen - but it gives citizens a right to challenge their detention as an enemy combatant in the domestic courts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-6696.ZS.html

concluded that although Congress authorized the detention of combatants in the narrow circumstances alleged in this case, due process demands that a citizen held in the United States as an enemy combatant be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for that detention before a neutral decisionmaker.

[–] Silverlining [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

2093 To Kill Mockingbird - Kavenagh - https://youtu.be/Tocc8EolxXg?t=478

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)