This post here was removed by the admin, and my account was permanently suspended for "posting personal information".
In response to them, I wrote this:
I was suspended for this thread Kevin McDonald has made himself a public figure. Although he has 0 notoriety, he is still a public figure, and therefore his name isn't Personal and Confidential information. for "posting personal information."
Under the Reddit Content Policy, the rules state:
Content is prohibited if it
- Is personal and confidential information
The name I posted is of a public figure, and this information has already been posted to reddit.
You can see that he attaches his name publicly to his online handle.
He even public posts his name here.
It's a far reach to claim that his name is "personal and confidential" when he himself makes it clear that is him and attaches his real life name to his internet handle. If that's "personal and confidential", then every reporter's name that is typed out on reddit should be stricken and the users banned.
[–]from MaleGoddess via /r/reddit.com sent 16 minutes ago
Furthermore, he says that his name is Kevin McDonald RIGHT HERE on reddit
archive
There is no way on Earth you can claim that is "personal and confidential information".
So, you can clearly see that KiA users and @netscape9 are ready to use SJW tactics when it suits their needs, but when you even jokingly ban someone from your subreddit, you already know nutscrape will be right there to claim that you're the SJW
There was a twitter back and forth today with the guy who popularized the term SJW, Will Shetterly, and he stated something that is so true, especially when it comes to nutscrape, Kevin McDonald:
The SJW's favorite tactics are mobbing, doxxing, banning, and censoring.
Source
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Shadist 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago (edited ago)
And now the circle is complete... First there was the "please take the post down.
followed by "I'm gonna try to trick you to take it down"
with a side of "I was only acting retarded"
And here
and now the final stage... "It was for realz a joke the entire time" right here.
I'm sure you'll ban me again for violating your safespace, but it was worth it to point out how utterly full of shit you are.
[–] MaleGoddess [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I would show you the secret talks behind closed doors where banning nutscrape was suggested by someone else, since nutscrape is anti-free speech.
... I can't facepalm hard enough. First off, you seem to stalk my profiles hard enough, but I don't understand why you haven't been able to grasp my views of "online harassment" - there's no such thing.
There's real world harassment - unsolicited phone calls, contacting employers with false information, making false accusations with the police, and what not that have real world effects on people. Online "harassment" isn't really a threat. There's block buttons, mute, banning, and finally the power button. Coming to my subverse to talk crap, or stalking my public profiles where I broadcast information, have no real world effect on me.
So, you are failing to see that my thread about "targeted harassment against me" was a joke, a mockery of KiA removing threads against Rule 5 or "D&C", except for when it's people they don't like, such as myself or Jkelly. ">it's OK when they do it" is a meme about SJWs, not an example to follow.
[–] Shadist 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
By stalking do you mean I've only mentioned threads you and I have replied to? If so then I'm a stalker by your measure. I've never cared enough to dig for anything with you... I'm not the one pointing out random wrongthink.
Like I said, first it was asking me to remove it, then it was trying to trick me to the same end, then it was all part of a plan, now it was all just a joke. These are in no way an internet standard progression to attempting to justify showing your ass.