You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
What makes you think that? even after all these crimes he still has refugee advocates backing him according to this article and I'm sure they would be fully aware of his complete situation by now. I doubt the process that allowed him to enter the community would change with any transparency because practicality on asylum seekers is continuously abandoned in favour of ideology due to the issue being so heavily politicised and the over compassionate media spin that follows. The Greens for example have pretty much always advocated for bridging visas to allow asylum seekers into the community for processing, even when asylum seekers arrive by illegal means. I suspect Mr Jafarri was in the community on a bridging visa to commit more crimes in 2012 because of the shutting down of the Pacific Solution and the policy failures of that time. With these elements in our society continuously saying how cruel we are to not bring Asylum Seekers into the community for processing despite the obvious inherent danger what hope of a popper debate do we have? Remember some of the people we take in have been child soldiers etc and have done some pretty horrific things, if the community knew they might say no without any consideration where some should be given. It's a complex topic but the community cant seem to get their heads around and out politicians cant either.
PS: upvoted because I don't think your opinion deserved a downvote.
Because transparency is the best and only way for Australians to make informed decisions.
I doubt the process that allowed him to enter the community would change with any transparency because practicality on asylum seekers is continuously abandoned in favour of ideology due to the issue being so heavily politicised and the over compassionate media spin that follows.
Unpolitical Australians are interactive on the information front, may I add that within an diplomatic system they are the voice of Australia. So the more information they are aloud to experience, they will then react to appropriately. If you close them off from information, how can they react to what they don't know.
The Greens for example have pretty much always advocated for bridging visas to allow asylum seekers into the community for processing.
We all know that the greens are on the outside when it comes to the two party system. In saying that, if you look through the cloud of the two party system, they do indeed have some sound policies for Australians across the board.
even when asylum seekers arrive by illegal means.
Transparency, transparency, transparency. If the people don't know, how can they make an informed decision? /r
I suspect Mr Jafarri was in the community on a bridging visa to commit more crimes in 2012 because of the shutting down of the Pacific Solution and the policy failures of that time.
You may be correct, Who knows though. without information, the so very precious privilege of understanding. Decisions are made by people every day. Why not give them the chance to make an informed decision.
With these elements in our society continuously saying how cruel we are to not bring Asylum Seekers into the community for processing despite the obvious inherent danger what hope of a popper debate do we have?
You know what, If you want to be that person, I'm good with that, you can project your word all over the place, all you want. I will always be here if you want to understand people over money, I have endless patience for you my friend. People first... You may think that the dollar will save humanity. It wont happen though without the people with all the money actually spending it... Its not that hard to understand, it just needs to be understood, without that you can be smart although may as wall as be lost in the system. Good luck my good friend.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 2ezy ago
What makes you think that? even after all these crimes he still has refugee advocates backing him according to this article and I'm sure they would be fully aware of his complete situation by now. I doubt the process that allowed him to enter the community would change with any transparency because practicality on asylum seekers is continuously abandoned in favour of ideology due to the issue being so heavily politicised and the over compassionate media spin that follows. The Greens for example have pretty much always advocated for bridging visas to allow asylum seekers into the community for processing, even when asylum seekers arrive by illegal means. I suspect Mr Jafarri was in the community on a bridging visa to commit more crimes in 2012 because of the shutting down of the Pacific Solution and the policy failures of that time. With these elements in our society continuously saying how cruel we are to not bring Asylum Seekers into the community for processing despite the obvious inherent danger what hope of a popper debate do we have? Remember some of the people we take in have been child soldiers etc and have done some pretty horrific things, if the community knew they might say no without any consideration where some should be given. It's a complex topic but the community cant seem to get their heads around and out politicians cant either.
PS: upvoted because I don't think your opinion deserved a downvote.
[–] blipblipbeep ago
Because transparency is the best and only way for Australians to make informed decisions.
Unpolitical Australians are interactive on the information front, may I add that within an diplomatic system they are the voice of Australia. So the more information they are aloud to experience, they will then react to appropriately. If you close them off from information, how can they react to what they don't know.
We all know that the greens are on the outside when it comes to the two party system. In saying that, if you look through the cloud of the two party system, they do indeed have some sound policies for Australians across the board.
Transparency, transparency, transparency. If the people don't know, how can they make an informed decision? /r
You may be correct, Who knows though. without information, the so very precious privilege of understanding. Decisions are made by people every day. Why not give them the chance to make an informed decision.
You know what, If you want to be that person, I'm good with that, you can project your word all over the place, all you want. I will always be here if you want to understand people over money, I have endless patience for you my friend. People first... You may think that the dollar will save humanity. It wont happen though without the people with all the money actually spending it... Its not that hard to understand, it just needs to be understood, without that you can be smart although may as wall as be lost in the system. Good luck my good friend.
peace...