0
2

[–] NateThomas1979 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not to get too far into it as it's not really something I'm interested in following, Usually that rule in forums is made so people don't put clickbait links such as "Do you think this is a good birthday cake?" and instead it's a video of Rick Ross.

It's to make it clear what the question is about and if sending people to a link, making it clear what the link goes to. A "link" is obviously referring to a 'hyperlink' not to text based questions.

0
1

[–] DirkKillraven [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

that actually clarifies things quite a bit. I misunderstood. thanks

0
0

[–] NateThomas1979 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I could be wrong but that would be how I read it. How much of a discussion would it be if you had to give a detailed response to open questions?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] DirkKillraven [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Didn't notice that. Is rule 2 intended only to apply to links but not discussions?

0
1

[–] HST 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yes.

[–] [deleted] 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] DirkKillraven [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Valid. I realise you guys are pretty stretched thin at the moment. I don't mean to cast blame on you guys, but instead encourage a little more thought going into the posts being generated here. It just seems no one's really acknowledging the description thing. I hope to see this sub and most importantly this site continue to thrive going forward.