Archived Is/Should mass dumping of links be considered spamming a subverse, even if they are "on-topic"? (AskVoat)
submitted ago by Danbear
Posted by: Danbear
Posting time: 5.7 years ago on
Last edit time: 5.7 years ago on
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 3754
SCP: 21
24 upvotes, 3 downvotes (89% upvoted it)
Archived Is/Should mass dumping of links be considered spamming a subverse, even if they are "on-topic"? (AskVoat)
submitted ago by Danbear
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Danbear [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
God this is going to turn into a retarded internet argument of semantics isn't it?
Look if he gave two craps about those stories he would have posted them one at a time and commented on them to generate a discussion. Instead he goes over to /v/martialarts and posts another 10+ posts as fast as possible without commenting.
If what you are saying was true his actions would have been different or at least there would be more actions to suggest your point is true.
But none of that really matters because he was just an example. I don't care about him, we aren't discussing his crucifixion here, were discussing if it should be ok for posters to bulk dump links to subs. Which if it is ok then its an easy script to have it automated for you and now we're just as shitty as reddit.
But Atko has already fixed the issue for testing, so I guess we'll see if it works better or worse.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] Danbear [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
I do highly doubt it. He has shown no evidence still that he read them. Hell he still hasn't posted once in any of those threads.
But again, he isn't the issue here. The issue is the practice of bulk dumping content.