You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

12
-11

[–] Clayton 12 points -11 points (+1|-12) ago 

You mean the concern that even the creator of this whole thing admitted was a hoax?

0
14

[–] mr_skeltal 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

You say the creator of this whole thing as if I haven't read the facts myself and come to my own conclusions. It is a fact that active posts were being deleted for stupid and contentious reasons. I'm not anybody's follower. If this is how you're going to behave I will remove myself from your subs, I do not agree with your carry on at all.

14
-14

[–] Clayton 14 points -14 points (+0|-14) ago 

It is a rule. You expect people just just be able to break rules? I don't care if you are a member of my subs or not to be frank with you /u/mr_skeltal. I think you are a swell guy, but if you are going to leave my subs because you don't like the opinions I hold I don't want you on my subs. Free speech is supposed to mean people can speak freely without any consequences. But look at /u/she, she is being witch hunted and brigaded because of things she said that people view as SJW-ish. I myself have been called an SJW because of many of my opinions, one of which being that /u/she did nothing wrong. Rule 1 was a rule that should have been followed. She removed the "critical" post because it did not contain a question mark. However, I resubmitted the post later along with other users and it was not removed because it contained a questions mark.

Disagree with the rules all you want, it is still a rule. Mods enforce rules regardless of their opinions about them (or at least they should). One user stirred up this whole controversy and /u/Atko decided he would be popular and throw /u/she under the bus. I am seriously considering asking Voat for a refund of all my donations over not just this but the way Atko is treating us over the past month.