You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] SerialChiller 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

She won't go to jail for election fraud, even if she deserves it. Even if widespread election fraud is proven, politicians at that level will maintain several layers of plausible deniability.

It is not sufficient for her to be the accidental beneficiary of someone else's fraudulent action. You will need ironclad proof that she personally knew about and ordered fraudulent activity to be carried out, AND you need a judiciary that has the balls to rule that the charges stick.

[–] kishind 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

AND you need a judiciary that has the balls

No, you need a citizenry that has the balls. Political corruption was never expected to police itself. Actually, Jefferson anticipated violent political conflict every 20 years.

[–] SerialChiller ago 

Agreed. I should say "A citizenry that has the balls, and a judiciary that has a spine."

[–] ElectionPredictor 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

NOT when they have their communications and their voices on tape, mate.

Gitmo.

"Bye-bye."

[–] SerialChiller 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

When?