You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] Cynical_Alien 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I would like to see a system where we vote for the moderators based on their respective contributions to a subverse. And every once in a while we revote so that moderators are accountable to the general populous of their subverse.

0
2

[–] FilmMakingShitlord 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Thus allowing unpopular opinion subverses to be taken over and destroyed for going against the hive mind. What a great system.

0
0

[–] Cynical_Alien 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah, it's not an invasion proof system. Then again I fucked up by thinking that people would leave each alone.

0
0

[–] InMediaRes [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

But at least it's governed by the hivemind, not a small circle of shadowy powermods.

0
2

[–] InMediaRes [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Once in four months? (: We could call them "President of the Subverse". They could campaign and stuff too!

0
1

[–] Cynical_Alien 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, there is a reason why we have a similar system in place for politicians and for other public officials. In theory it should work, and as a failsafe we should also have it where there are people who moderate moderators. These sub-mods would have no power in terms of the subverse but could watch and suspend mods.

0
0

[–] NeedleInAHaystack 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That seems like a fair idea.

Kind of like what @Haredeenee did in /v/canada https://voat.co/v/Canada/comments/156727

0
0

[–] Haredeenee 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

oh, did i do something good not to be called a shill and receive death threats from /v/conspiracy? YAY go me!