You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
13

[–] fatpeoplesuck 4 points 13 points (+17|-4) ago  (edited ago)

What if someone had an unpopular opinion about jews, blacks, whites, females or males would we remove them? As long as they don't ban people because of opinions then who cares. Make another subverse. I only saw one post that didn't violate the rules. Out of the hundreds. We all make mistakes. If it was blatant abuse she should be removed. We are no better than the sjw if we hang people on a cross for an opinion that is not mainstream on voat. `

0
9

[–] ElectricParkour 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Police everything, or police nothing.

Default subs ought to be as neutral as possible.

0
1

[–] misnamed 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

No rules! Anarchy for the defaults.

0
0

[–] FilmMakingShitlord 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

There are no default subs.

0
1

[–] Chiefpacman 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Agreed, we shouldn't hang her for her views. We should do it for forcing them on others. You can't go deleting a submission, from the front page, that calls you out for abusing mod powers. If a submission is on the front page, it shouldn't be deleted- ever. Once it's gained that much momentum, a fucking question mark does not matter.

0
0

[–] fatpeoplesuck 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I disagree it was the first rules. If you have a sub the rules should be enforced otherwise it dilutes the value. Now if she started changing rules like no sexim then she should be removed. Or if she removes opinions because they are not sjw. In the guise of spam.