You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

14
10

[–] HomerSimpson 14 points 10 points (+24|-14) ago 

With what evidence do you have? If they don't try to spread their views onto people here through modding why should they not be a mod? It is not a slippery slope. It is people like you gathering to witch hunt someone over stupid comments.

1
38

[–] Truly 1 points 38 points (+39|-1) ago 

Rather than type it out again, here is what I posted in the original thread she deleted-

I think the issue people have with She is that she is trying to gain top-level control of a major subverse. Noone with such a strong bias on either side should be in control of a major sub. The vast majority of these people would be just as vehemently opposed to someone from v/niggers taking control of v/askvoat. I say let anyone post whatever bullshit they want, but don't let the most opinionated amongst us moderate.

.

She made a really stupid statement applying intentions to a whole group of people stating it as fact. Its perfectly reasonable to expect a more level-headed person in control of a major subverse.

It appears she is attempting to gain top-level control of askvoat. Showing/discussing that she is so heavily biased against an entire group of people is relevant considering this information.

I believe any poster should be able to say anything at all that they want, but mods should do their best to remain impartial. Showing you have such pre-conceived notions, lack of understanding on reasoned argument, and silly misconceptions seems like a pretty solid reason to stop someone from gaining control of one of the largest verses.

12
-11

[–] HomerSimpson 12 points -11 points (+1|-12) ago 

It appears she is attempting to gain top-level control of askvoat. Showing/discussing that she is so heavily biased against an entire group of people is relevant considering this information.

Not seen a single bias statement from @she as of yet in this sub especially when they moderate.

I believe any poster should be able to say anything at all that they want, but mods should do their best to remain impartial. Showing you have such pre-conceived notions, lack of understanding on reasoned argument, and silly misconceptions seems like a pretty solid reason to stop someone from gaining control of one of the largest verses.

They literally haven't done anything that would make them too close to a decision.

Now to the requesting part. @She requested the sub because A. the top mod is inactive. and B. because at the time of the request only a top mod can do most mod work(since has changed.) Not to mention the other moderators of this sub have all been in support of @she becoming head mod.