You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

20
88

[–] Charley 20 points 88 points (+108|-20) ago 

Based on her comment history, she has no place being a mod here. This is a slippery slope if you'd like Voat turning into Reddit.

7
35

[–] JoeWise 7 points 35 points (+42|-7) ago  (edited ago)

I don't think we can use her comment history against her in that way but I do believe she has already abused her power. Also, if you look at the front page it seems an overwhelming majority of AskVoat and Voat in general disagree with /u/she being a mod of AskVoat. That alone should get her moderator status removed.

1
46

[–] 1741666 1 points 46 points (+47|-1) ago 

The comment history of the account you're using to mod should very much be 'admissible' in any discussion on suitability to mod.

14
10

[–] HomerSimpson 14 points 10 points (+24|-14) ago 

With what evidence do you have? If they don't try to spread their views onto people here through modding why should they not be a mod? It is not a slippery slope. It is people like you gathering to witch hunt someone over stupid comments.

1
38

[–] Truly 1 points 38 points (+39|-1) ago 

Rather than type it out again, here is what I posted in the original thread she deleted-

I think the issue people have with She is that she is trying to gain top-level control of a major subverse. Noone with such a strong bias on either side should be in control of a major sub. The vast majority of these people would be just as vehemently opposed to someone from v/niggers taking control of v/askvoat. I say let anyone post whatever bullshit they want, but don't let the most opinionated amongst us moderate.

.

She made a really stupid statement applying intentions to a whole group of people stating it as fact. Its perfectly reasonable to expect a more level-headed person in control of a major subverse.

It appears she is attempting to gain top-level control of askvoat. Showing/discussing that she is so heavily biased against an entire group of people is relevant considering this information.

I believe any poster should be able to say anything at all that they want, but mods should do their best to remain impartial. Showing you have such pre-conceived notions, lack of understanding on reasoned argument, and silly misconceptions seems like a pretty solid reason to stop someone from gaining control of one of the largest verses.

[–] [deleted] 9 points 8 points (+17|-9) ago 

[Deleted]

7
4

[–] Icy-Defiance 7 points 4 points (+11|-7) ago 

Haven't we been recommending that people notify authorities when they see something they think is illegal?

9
1

[–] Oire 9 points 1 points (+10|-9) ago 

She reported content she felt to be in violation of US federal law. How is that a continuation of her "abuse of power"?

4
2

[–] G4 4 points 2 points (+6|-4) ago 

I feel like what you personally believe and how you handle things "professionally" are 2 different things.

0
4

[–] Truly 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Not when the professional job you want is moderation of a discussion forum. Noone would want a radical skinhead running askvoat. For the same reason noone wants a person claiming only bigots oppose the SJW movement running one of the core subverses.