You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
13

[–] G4 4 points 13 points (+17|-4) ago 

No. Rules should be sub-based entirely. Site-wide rules lead to censorship.

6
11

[–] dannydale--- 6 points 11 points (+17|-6) ago  (edited ago)

If you want to become a default sub, you should be under strict voat policy since default subs BENEFIT from an artificial head start. we regulate gas, electricity, and water for a good reason.

if you want to be your own niche sub, have at it.

You can't hold your leaders accountable until you learn to hold YOURSELVES accountable by putting your own views under public scrutiny.

0
3

[–] acunningone 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I concur.

0
0

[–] normal_dude 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Voat has no default subs.

0
3

[–] Treysef 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

We already have site-wide rules, though.

https://voat.co/help/faq

If majority of the links you submit are to sites you are associated with, your domains may be globally banned from Voat. To be on the safe side, if you submit 10 links to various subverses on Voat, at most 2 of the 10 submitted links may be to the sites you are associated with.

and

Each subverse has its own rules which are stated in respective subverse sidebars. If you ignore said rules, your account may be banned from submitting further content to the subverse or in some cases, globally.

0
0

[–] Porphyrogennetos 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I agree except for defaults.