You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
52

[–] Big_Dumb_Animal 1 points 52 points (+53|-1) ago 

She should be allowed to express her ideas, but not free to censor others' ideas she does not like. She has already demonstrated her willingness to do so.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

2
-1

[–] sneakybells 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

I disagree. Every questionable deletion has been some variant of low effort DAE bullshit that does really ask anything but instead pushes an idea in the form of a question.

0
8

[–] Sabactus 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Yeah, that's kinda what I said.

Moderators got to understand that they have to have two different thought processes and behaviors on Voat. One being their line member thought process and behavior. They can create, consume, and discuss content based on their own personal ideologies. The other being their thought process and behavior as a moderator. As a moderator, they must strive to be unbiased in everything that they do. Voat cannot survive as a forum for free speech if they do not. If a post does not violate any of the rules or Voat or the subverse then they must leave it alone regardless of how loud their personal ideologies are screaming in their ear.

0
0

[–] Big_Dumb_Animal 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Sorry, was agreeing with you. I got your point, just wanted to add my spin.

0
0

[–] 12_Years_A_Toucan 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Where?

0
0

[–] dis_is_my_account 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Has she though? I haven't seen anyone provide evidence yet.

0
1

[–] sneakybells 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I've been debating people alll day, the truth is there isn't. People keep citing the same sort of low effort DAE questions that aren't really questions but statements disguised as questions. Like is x a shill, followed by a bunch of links OP thought makes x a shill. They're leading questions meant to push an agenda but people are scratching at anything trying to make something fit their narrative of she being this rogue sjw mod.

0
0

[–] Big_Dumb_Animal 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm on my phone and at work so forgive the lack of hyper links, however the information is available. Most frequently cited example is deleting a popular post which included a "?" And a question. Once the mistake is pointed out she changed it to the the catch all spam, etc. and "this belongs in another sub". Providing no explanation as to which sub or why.

That my friend is censorship 101.