3
121

[–] Sabactus 3 points 121 points (+124|-3) ago 

No. But not because of her ideologies.

Voat is supposed to be bastion of free speech and she should be free to express her ideologies but those expressions should be separate and apart from her duties as a moderator. In order for Voat to survive as a forum of free speech the moderators must do their utmost to remain unbiased in the performance of their responsibilities. She should not be a moderator of /v/AskVoat because she has proven herself to be incapable of remaining unbiased in her moderation.

1
52

[–] Big_Dumb_Animal 1 points 52 points (+53|-1) ago 

She should be allowed to express her ideas, but not free to censor others' ideas she does not like. She has already demonstrated her willingness to do so.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
8

[–] Sabactus 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Yeah, that's kinda what I said.

Moderators got to understand that they have to have two different thought processes and behaviors on Voat. One being their line member thought process and behavior. They can create, consume, and discuss content based on their own personal ideologies. The other being their thought process and behavior as a moderator. As a moderator, they must strive to be unbiased in everything that they do. Voat cannot survive as a forum for free speech if they do not. If a post does not violate any of the rules or Voat or the subverse then they must leave it alone regardless of how loud their personal ideologies are screaming in their ear.

0
0

[–] 12_Years_A_Toucan 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Where?

0
0

[–] dis_is_my_account 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Has she though? I haven't seen anyone provide evidence yet.

0
13

[–] NeedleInAHaystack 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Well said. That is an important distinction. Her views/comments shouldn't qualify or disqualify her. It comes down to an ability to remain unbiased and moderate responsibly.

Her inability to do either disqualifies her from being a moderator, not her ideologies.

So no, i don't believe she is fit to moderate askvoat.

0
2

[–] weezkitty 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This exactly right. Just like the judge that sentenced the 19 year old "sex offender" so harshly for his ideology. I didn't even have a problem with the judges ideology - but you must keep it out of objective judgements. Moderating askvoat is no different. Believe or comment what you want. Just don't delete comments you disagree with.

0
0

[–] FPHrefugee 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

exactly, I completely agree. It's fine to have opinions, it's not fine to use them as a basis for how you enforce rules on a large, default (is that the term for it here?) sub. She can share her opinions and we can share them. So no, because they deleted a post it seems because of her personal bias, not because the subs rules

6
42

[–] toyhammer98 6 points 42 points (+48|-6) ago 

She's trying to bring the fempire here, so no.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] sparkybear 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

She doesn't have control over that. Only the owner of the sub does

3
34

[–] maxk42 3 points 34 points (+37|-3) ago 

Fuck no

3
25

[–] purr 3 points 25 points (+28|-3) ago 

No. No no no. I harbor no hate for her, but I strongly disapprove of the way she's moderating this sub. I hope she gets demodded.

2
12

[–] Stansfield [S] 2 points 12 points (+14|-2) ago 

Initially posted without the "holly" question mark. Was only up for a few seconds before I removed the original and re-posted. Sorry.

2
11

[–] freetheloli 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago 

No i hope she steps back so this anoying Drama can end. She should open some feminist sub since this is clearly her haupt interesst

0
6

[–] l23r 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

4
11

[–] JoeMomma8008 4 points 11 points (+15|-4) ago 

I vote no... Fuck that piece of shit.

http://memecrunch.com/image/5254e1b81605fb0d1a000001.jpg

0
10

[–] swingvoater 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The poll is flawed. For example, I think that they should probably not be allowed to mod, but not because of their views or ideologies, but only because it looks like they are removing posts that they disagree with.

It should include two more options:

NO because I believe that they have used their position to remove posts that contradicted their ideologies.

YES, even if they are using their position to remove posts that contradict their ideologies. I don't have a problem with that.

load more comments ▼ (35 remaining)