18
254

[–] weezkitty 18 points 254 points (+272|-18) ago 

I think she has. She is stretching the sub rules as an excuse to remove posts. She often follows the SJW agenda and should not be a mod of any large sub.

1
164

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 1 points 164 points (+165|-1) ago  (edited ago)

This is why /v/askvoat/modlog/deleted is so important. So that you can prove things like this.

For example, she deleted this: https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/comments/401467 (screenshot as an archive (warning, large))

Edit Bonus humor: Look at the linked thread and notice how @gerplunckamo username mentioned the seven moderators, and got downvoated exactly seven times. @she and her SRS cronies are mad. I love having vote counters back.

3
101

[–] mwolf 3 points 101 points (+104|-3) ago  (edited ago)

The fact that she rushed to remove it and stretched rule 3 very thinly to do so is one of the reasons that points to why she needs to be removed.

Only later did she come back and say that it was deleted because "ideas for /v/AskVoat go in /v/ModsOfAskVoat"

Edit: the point is, a mod should be slow to delete and have the relevant reason ready at deletion time. The "delete and come up with the correct justification later" behavior is undesirable behavior for a mod.

5
45

[–] that-all-you-got 5 points 45 points (+50|-5) ago 

That was just beautiful, if anyone has any doubt just read this and have a look through her comments.

She's got stop modding anything.

[–] [deleted] 3 points 1 points (+4|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Fox_Tango 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I mean, what's not clear about

Q: I have an idea for /v/askvoat?
A: Post about them on /v/ModsOfAskVoat

7
54

[–] l23r 7 points 54 points (+61|-7) ago 

/u/she probably has, and /u/she should not be the mod of any sub except for some carpet munching SJW sub.

2
17

[–] WiseThat 2 points 17 points (+19|-2) ago 

Come now. I object to the deletions, but let's not be flippant, generalizing, and insulting while we do it. If we are really all after intelligent, free discourse then we should be doing that, not lowering the bar in an attempt to get some cheap punches in.

33
-33

36
-36

1
14

[–] TahTahBur 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

0
9

[–] dante2025 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

If that nut is showing shes unable to do her job properly she shouldn't be a mod in ANY sub. I don't care if its big or not. This is what ruined Reddit. Revoke her mod privileges ASAP and don't give her a position of authority anywhere on this site.

2
105

[–] swingvoater [S] 2 points 105 points (+107|-2) ago  (edited ago)

(I made sure to include the '?' !)

If this happened in subs that they started, no problem.

But, typical SJW behaviour is to find something popular, worm their way in, and then start forcing SJW rules on everyone else.

So, if they were simply added as a mod to a popular sub such as /v/askvoat after it was already popular, and then started to perform SJW/SRS type actions, such as deleting posts because they were triggered, then that would be somewhat interesting.

[–] [deleted] 8 points 56 points (+64|-8) ago 

[Deleted]

6
14

[–] swingvoater [S] 6 points 14 points (+20|-6) ago  (edited ago)

Really? Good thing this isn't one of them. There have been accusations of varying degrees of SJW-ness, up to and including deleting posts that they didn't like.

I'm looking for examples (or denials).

question for you though: would the flip side of agent provocateurs be white knights? Like the kind that might go around accusing people of being agent provocateurs in order to defend the honour of their m'lady? (by the way, @she may have some surprises for you)

22
-17

10
-10

[–] [deleted] 6 points 60 points (+66|-6) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

3
35

[–] swingvoater [S] 3 points 35 points (+38|-3) ago 

But, that's a pretty big one.

@she mentions a rule against soapboxing as the reason for the post's removal. On the side bar I see now, that is not a rule.

Was that rule removed in the past two hours (when @she made the commend) or was that made up?

1
43

[–] IIsAShloff 1 points 43 points (+44|-1) ago 

"Soapboxing" strikes me as a very vague and broad term. It could easily be misused

[–] [deleted] 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

3
-3

[–] 12_Years_A_Toucan 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

It's literally under rule 3

Spam, marketing, clickbait, self-promotion & soap boxing are not allowed

0
8

[–] Skeletor 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Yea that's the only Removal i see as well that doesn't sit well with me.

2
40

[–] ArkhamKnight 2 points 40 points (+42|-2) ago 

I was looking at she's account and I can see the request she made to be a moderator of Askvoat and everyone was against it. How did she ever become a mod in the first place?

5
21

[–] AnTi90d 5 points 21 points (+26|-5) ago 

Moe is from SRS and is a mod of v/subverserequest. That is how SJWs take over subverses; they sneak one member into power and then disseminate authority to their other cohorts.

1
6

[–] ShagginTurtles 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Now what proof do you have against @moe? He's been super helpful for me on voat. I've yet to see anyone complain about him in any way

1
4

[–] DanielFlamino 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

She was added by the top mod. Also anyone can request any subverse, as long as they meet the requirements, which she did.

1
1

[–] TahTahBur 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

[–] [deleted] 6 points -2 points (+4|-6) ago 

[Deleted]

5
3

[–] TahTahBur 5 points 3 points (+8|-5) ago 

Okay SJW

1
29

[–] Vanwe 1 points 29 points (+30|-1) ago 

This is the only question worth asking in regards to all this hooplah.

2
27

[–] slope 2 points 27 points (+29|-2) ago  (edited ago)

The SJW's must be stopped now in their tracks, or they will try to forcibly takeover and close voat subverses as they have done on sheddit.

1
4

[–] WhiteEyesBlackJackal 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Exactly!

2
23

[–] Sadistic_Bastard 2 points 23 points (+25|-2) ago 

Yeah, I'm curious as well. If they haven't, who gives a rat's ass. They're an opinionated mod, whoopty-doo.

If they have, then fucking remove them, since they're clearly a rogue mod.

3
17

[–] HowAboutShutUp 3 points 17 points (+20|-3) ago 

I think the main issue is the mod in question appears to subscribe to the same ideology that turned reddit into a censorious shithole. To be fair, reddit was a shithole in various ways basically from the start, but people could still have disagreements without it turning into an orgy of censorship and harassment by a select group that appears to operate with carte blanche. Additionally, it was possible to avoid crap you didn't wanna see, but moderation by hardline ideologues gradually bled into huge swathes of what should have been innocuous parts of reddit. Naturally people are going to be gun-shy of that, because what assurance do they have that someone isn't going to moderate by the same ideological viewpoints that led us here to begin with? I think if there were a way to institute some check and balance sort of mechanism on rogue moderating, there'd probably be less of an uproar.

3
10

[–] Sadistic_Bastard 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago 

Yes, I understand that, but does she not has the right to hold on to her beliefs and express them? That is after all what Voat is supposed to be about. She still gets downvoted and negative comments, but (as far as I know) she hasn't abused her powers as moderator. She has the freedom of speech to voice her opinions, however radical they may be, same as any other user on Voat, but when she crosses the line by actively censoring users and deleting comments, then we have a problem.

9
7

[–] oaken 9 points 7 points (+16|-9) ago 

It doesn't matter that she has similar views to those on reddit. She is entitled to them. As long as she doesn't let those views affect her moderation, there is nothing to talk about here. And so far, I have seen 0 proof of her doing so in this thread.

0
2

[–] ialreadyhaveaccount 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well said!

[–] [deleted] 8 points 1 points (+9|-8) ago 

[Deleted]

0
10

[–] MCVoat 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

The internet needs less opinionated mods

6
-5

0
21

[–] TahTahBur 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Yes - perfect example: she removes a question because it is a question Up voat for visibility!

load more comments ▼ (37 remaining)