You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
14

[–] puddlewonderful 2 points 14 points (+16|-2) ago 

To say the mod should be censored is contradicting the idea this is a free speech platform.

I also don't see the issue with that phrase. I do see an issue with people witch hunting after a person for a voiced opinion, which is what this thread is getting at.

7
4

[–] Clayton [S] 7 points 4 points (+11|-7) ago 

I'm not witchhunting. I am showing how stupid the argument is that @she is censoring /v/askvoat. The previous post that was removed was removed because it violated rule 1. That started the "I am being censored" drama. This post does not violate rule 1.

1
2

[–] puddlewonderful 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I only see people who are butthurt about having a post removed because it violated the rules.

You said it yourself, that's all this is. I don't get why I've seen this user's name thrown all over the place like a celebrity just for disagreeing. The disagreements hardly have depth they escalate so quickly to pure hate. Is this really the center of Voat?

8
-6

[–] MisterDave_ 8 points -6 points (+2|-8) ago 

If the mod is going to censor the user base the mod should be removed. You have to be a complete fucking idiot not to grasp this simple point.

You can't hold your leaders accountable until you learn to hold YOURSELVES accountable by putting your own views under public scrutiny.