You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] theGozarian 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you were being objective, and I don't think you are, would you at least be able to understand why the sentence:

Post titles must include a question

"?"

would make plenty of people think that the rule has fuck all to do with punctuation and everything to do with making sure questions are asked? Because that isn't even a proper sentence and certainly doesn't say, "must include question mark". I mean, for sure someone would interpret that as include the punctuation, but many other completely reasonable people would not have and would have seen nothing wrong with the post. Great conversation had already taken hold, a warning with some clarity should have sufficed and any reasonable person can see that. Given more rational alternatives existed and the mod who removed it was the subject of the post, I think we can apply Occam's Razor here and at least understand why a thinking man would see the obvious bullshit and not just a moderator applying the rules evenly and fairly.

0
0

[–] bilog78 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I think we can apply Occam's Razor here and at least understand why a thinking man would see the obvious bullshit and not just a moderator applying the rules evenly and fairly.

Actually, no, Occam's Razor here would be exactly about Rule 1 and the stupid question mark, considering that all submissions without one have been deleted for that same reasons, both by @she and other mods, _consistently_. This is the exactly te first thing one gathers from all the “GET HER OUT OF THE MOD ROLL” links to the modlog.

0
0

[–] theGozarian 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

considering that all submissions without one have been deleted for that same reasons

Simply not true, in this thread are examples of them getting through. So no. It has not been applied evenly or consistently.