[–] [deleted] 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And the even worse thing is that the majority of whoever turns up rules, often at the expense of the actual majority.

0
5

[–] ixlen 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

The competing hugboxes would vote against each other. The largest hugbox would win.

1
-1

[–] gatordontplaythatsht [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Maybe, maybe not if the system is designed properly.

0
4

[–] 3226 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

If you can ban a mod for bias in one direction, you can ban them in the other direction.

Tell me what about your suggestion stops SRS coming over en masse once registration is fuly open, voting people out of every sub they disagree with, and then taking over?

1
4

[–] G4 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Nah. I don't like the idea. Maybe some of the default @system made ones, but other than that there's no reason to. Subs are the vision of their mods and owners, it's not fair to take that away from them.

5
-4

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] LegoMyEgo 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Seriously, if mod elections were a thing, mods would either spend all their time campaigning to keep their spot or never participate at all in fear of pissing someone off because they voiced their opinion.

Another concern would be election brigading. What's to keep someone from posting in a different large sub to rally the votes and get people riled up to vote for or against someone?

2
0

[–] gatordontplaythatsht [S] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

I foresee some complications with voting, like any process. I also see it as a final solution to mod collusion and corruption, a very big issue for reddit and voat right now.