EDIT: I’ve got enough of the recorded meeting in a video, and I have screenshots of the comments from the senior engineer, which is actually the most important part. I will likely be chatting with an attorney today.
...
In the meeting, the head of HR (a White female) said, “We get a lot of applicants for our jobs, and they all look the same - you know what I mean. ... As of now we will be pausing the hiring of non POC until we find applicants who fit the racial mix we want in the company.”
Now here’s the crucial part. A leading engineer posed a question through the meeting chat. He asked for clarification on this since it’s difficult to find qualified candidates. The HR gal verbally responded that yes they’d delay hiring Whites In favor of POCs.
And the engineer then asked for further clarification stating that this means we’re effectively not hiring White people since a company has a short window within which to hire a good candidates (meaning they’ll get snapped up by another firm).
HR gal did not respond to this as I think it treads on illegality.
Can anyone confirm this? Also, what can I do about this? As I said the meeting was recorded.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Historybuffman ago
I have been looking into the discrimination against men and whites for awhile and can assure you that this is illegal.
As an aside, I encourage you to speak to a lawyer and sue the shit out of the company for discrimination against people of your race. While criminal cases use the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard, civil cases use a "more likely than not" standard, and this shows open discrimination against your people.
Seems like a Jew thing to do, but hey, this is the game now. Learn to play it or get out. Companies will only stop doing this shit when it starts affecting their profits.
As a quick history lesson, Affirmative Action actually makes discrimination against White people and men completely legal. This was shown in the SCOTUS cases United Steelworkers v Weber and expanded on it in Johnson v Transportation Agency.
HOWEVER, there are caveats. For racial discrimination, there is a 5-part test laid out in the ruling in Weber:
The discrimination must:
As you can see, just on the face of it with the info you have, a minimum of 2 of the 5 prongs are not met. This makes the discrimination illegal.