11
28

[–] wackwack 11 points 28 points (+39|-11) ago 

Guys, let's not turn voat into a gigantic anti-srs circlejerk, ok?

0
12

[–] panandora 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

It'll pass, just like everything else causing a stir over there.

0
4

[–] foshizzle 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's been that for months before you were here.

1
-1

[–] zambeezy 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

If you don't like the content of the posts you are free to unsubscribe from the subverse or post your own content. Why should we do what you say and not post anti-srs content? Why should you call the shots? You've only been here for one month

2
-2

[–] wackwack 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Do whatever the hell you want, it's just a suggestion. Imo voat will be more interesting when people stop obsessing over the other site in general and srs in particular.

And screw your feels, I've been here for a month and I'll say what I want

2
19

[–] Clayton 2 points 19 points (+21|-2) ago 

What terrorist group has SRS gave material support to?

4
16

[–] goatboy [S] 4 points 16 points (+20|-4) ago  (edited ago)

We'd need to check their mod logs to be sure, but I remember one of their mods or someone joking about sending money to ISIL as a way to silence white men and hurting Israel because of the Palestinians. If anyone has a link to the actual discussion, it would be helpful.

1
21

[–] Clayton 1 points 21 points (+22|-1) ago 

But is it creditable? That is what it takes to start an investigation. They can't just open investigations into people willy nilly, there has to be a creditable and reasonable suspicion a crime was committed. I would say someone on the internet saying they donated to ISIS is not creditable. I highly doubt just anyone can donate to ISIS anyways.

By the way, thank you for answering my question unlike the other people.

0
14

[–] Echo_of_Savages 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Sounds like some bullshit someone on the internet would say.

1
1

[–] LittleBobbyTables 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Listen I am clearly against the SJW movement and the censorship and SRS bullshit, etc... however I don't think there needs to be a full on escalation of extremist tactics to try and prove a point or attempt to attack them with shit like this. To be clear - if an individual or group within their ranks actually did support ISIS in some way then I would hope the authorities would do their jobs properly and investigate them. I just don't want to see the equivalent of people at voat resorting to things like swatting or similar type tactics to wield against the others over there simply to one-up them. We are better than that and do not need to fall to their level of douchebaggery else we become no better than they are and essentially turn into the very things we hate.

0
0

[–] bannana 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You do know SRS is a circlejerk and most of the shit they say inside the sub is not serious? I'm not defending them I'm just telling you their protocol.

1
4

[–] Gerplunckamo 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

sniff sniff

Hey guys, do you smell that?

I think its fucking bacon.

0
3

[–] Keeok 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yea I definitely smell a pork product of some type.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

2
-1

[–] Clayton 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Bacon? Where? Is it free? I love bacon!

4
1

[–] 6double5321 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

Of course the cop circlejerk is interested.

4
1

[–] Biohazard 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

I think it was justified and the person was an obvious threat.

Wait...what are we talking about again?

4
-1

[–] Clayton 4 points -1 points (+3|-4) ago 

1
-1

[–] gcranston 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

can someone please explain what SRS is?

1
0

[–] Clayton 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

/r/shitredditsays it is a Social Justice Warrior sub that brigades other subs when someone says something they deem as offensive.

4
18

[–] the_spectre 4 points 18 points (+22|-4) ago 

Well, the SPLC is a sketchy organization that parasitizes legitimate movements and labels movements that run counter to its chosen ideological agenda as hate groups, so a campaign to discredit it, at the least, should probably be started.

2
3

[–] pocketForceNapkin 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

You are going to need to post some sources for this statement.

parasitizes legitimate movements and labels movements that run counter to its chosen ideological agenda as hate groups

1
15

[–] the_spectre 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

Well, here's an article on some of its questionable moves. Here's one criticizing its hate designations

Specifically, it's listed A Voice For Men as a hate group. I challenge you to find truly hateful and misogynist opinions expressed by any of their influential repeat contributors. You won't. Makes me think that it's a specious accusation to discredit the MHRM.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

0
6

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Nice try, domestic terrorist!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
1

[–] Acerebral 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I would agree with you if you mean that the "domestic" suffix is unnecessary. Like "reverse" racism is just racism, "domestic" terrorism is just terrorism. It doesn't matter where a person comes from if they use violence and fear to push a political agenda. I would even agree that the term "terrorist" has been stripped of all meaning to the point where any crime can be called terrorism if politically convenient.

If you mean that there are no American terrorists, I would most strongly disagree.

[–] [deleted] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
1

[–] Chompchompers 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

0
2

[–] Fambida 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Out of all the possible options you chose to go with The Dorner? McVeigh or Kaczynsci would have been better choices I think. The Dorner was a murderer, yes, but he wasn't a terrorist.

0
5

[–] TheKillerRabbit 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

If people find concrete evidence that such things are going on, then yes. I believe the main issue relies in finding said evidence. I remain skeptical of screenshots showing text posts as they can easily be photoshopped. The best evidence would reside in the server's data logs. I'm not sure whether you need a warrant to check them.

2
4

[–] AbruptlyBlue 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

I guess those who fled Reddit for the land of free speech, really don't like it for others?

2
4

[–] goatboy [S] 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

Do you think advocating sending money to ISIS is a supported free speech?

0
3

[–] AbruptlyBlue 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Who has said send money to them?

0
4

[–] Gerplunckamo 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Fighting a corrupt system with another corrupt system. Yeah, that'll work.

0
4

[–] armday2day 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Nations go to war all the time...

[–] [deleted] 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] misnamed 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

ya i agree sounds like bs.

op is fucked now.

dat be serious rumor mongering right dere.

shit gun na get real now.

also will voat turn into outlet for trolls now?

1
-1

[–] goatboy [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

That would make for a funny Senate oversight hearing.

"You mean to tell us you had a tip of a possible terrorist attack and instead of following through on it, you investigated the concerned citizen? We're going to need to transfer funding for your department to an agency that actually investigates terrorists next year."

load more comments ▼ (11 remaining)