[–] SpecialtyPizza 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Who would have ever thought that niggers could be racist?

[–] rumorhazard 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What actually was apartheid, without jewry interference?

The Dutch settlers were too kind to the nogs. Unlike in the USA, they didn't systematically eradicate them. Instead they believed that they could live together. Many of the architects of apartheid were heavily in favor of cultural studies. I believe Verwoerd started the anthropology department at Stellenbosch university. They recognized, after living in close proximity to blacks, that there were cultural differences that could not be reconciled, but that people should live peacefully.

However, now we have 20/20 vision in hindsight. It is clearer than ever that they are essentially sub-human animals. Show me a successful african country. Show me an african country where, without white intervention, people aren't literally shitting on the streets, fucking animals and eating each other.

[–] CognitiveDissident5 [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And don't forget they all had their own homelands, Swaziland for the Swazis, Botswana for the Tswanas, etc. Only the Boer doesn't have (or no longer has) his own homeland.

Apartheid simply means Separateness, as in a policy of separate development.

[–] 369693936 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 


Last week, California's insane legislators voted to repeal the following:

› Article I - Declaration of Rights › Section 31.

2018 California Constitution

Article I - Declaration of Rights

Section 31.

Universal Citation: CA Constitution art I § 31 (2018)

SEC. 31.

(a) The State shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

(b) This section shall apply only to action taken after the section’s effective date.

(c) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting bona fide qualifications based on sex which are reasonably necessary to the normal operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

(d) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as invalidating any court order or consent decree which is in force as of the effective date of this section.

(e) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting action which must be taken to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to the State.

(f) For the purposes of this section, “State” shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the State itself, any city, county, city and county, public university system, including the University of California, community college district, school district, special district, or any other political subdivision or governmental instrumentality of or within the State.

(g) The remedies available for violations of this section shall be the same, regardless of the injured party’s race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin, as are otherwise available for violations of then-existing California antidiscrimination law.

(h) This section shall be self-executing. If any part or parts of this section are found to be in conflict with federal law or the United States Constitution, the section shall be implemented to the maximum extent that federal law and the United States Constitution permit. Any provision held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section.

(Sec. 31 added Nov. 5, 1996, by Prop. 209. Initiative measure.)

[–] stoicmanchild ago 

Im so confused how Prop 209 was ever even needed... as federal laws prevent discrimination since the Civil Rights Act

[–] AhmaudArbery 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

"equality" isn't it great

[–] LibertarianForChrist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Imagine having the entire world given to you for free, and still sucking more than the people you kill and rape. People who have to work in order to pay for it all.

[–] CognitiveDissident5 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yes, 3 million Whites (who pay 80 percent of the taxes) are deemed such a threat against 70 million feral bantu invaders that they have to be legislated out of the way.

[–] Siguy2133 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Do any of you fuckers know how to save Shit on voat? I’ve had account for awhile now (fuck you I’m not new) but I can’t save anything to it like stats and facts like the ones in this post you fucks are some of the few actually supplying credited information to counter the Glo-niggers constant dis info and it’s a bitch finding it here

[–] CognitiveDissident5 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for taking an interest in this post you little fucker.

[–] TheNewOne ago 

Click the ellipsis (...) under the post and then hit save.

[–] Siguy2133 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You mother fucker!!!! Thank you

[–] boekanier ago 

Anyway, 'whites' are fair game in SA.

[–] Whitening ago 

PLEASE, CHINA, take over South Africa !!!!

[–] CognitiveDissident5 [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Are you aware that the Chinese have honorary black status in SA to circumvent these laws? Those chinks are smart.

[–] Whitening ago 

No. Sure hope they put them to good use!

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)