0
57

[–] ToFat2Fish 0 points 57 points (+57|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Don't let anyone in your house. If they force their way in shoot them dead. This is what ar's were made for.

0
9

[–] NiggadermCQ 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

00 buck is for when they arrive

5.56 is for when they are coming.

3
8

[–] ShakklezthaKlown 3 points 8 points (+11|-3) ago 

guns are only made for defense goy

1
24

[–] AR47 1 point 24 points (+25|-1) ago 

Defending your liberty with extreme prejudice?

0
4

[–] zozimus 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

If someone enters your house without permission, that is defense.

0
5

[–] FoundingUncle 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

If you can mount a defense against armed home invaders, you can care for your kids.

2
3

[–] Shotinthedark 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago  (edited ago)

AR's were made for sporting. The m16 they are modeled after was made for war. Now AKs are made for killing

0
2

[–] Plavonica 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There's an AR model that shoots .308/7.62.

1
1

[–] 223_556_1776 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

M16's are modeled after AR's not the other way around. Original Army rifles were stamped AR15.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
22

[–] FoundingUncle 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

All that says is if the CPS case worker determines you can not care for your kids, and then takes them, that they have to make a note if you have COVID-19. It would, for example, be a bad idea to put those kids in with a large group of kids when they might be infected and asymptomatic. It would be worse to put them with elderly care givers.

It does not say the CPS worker will take away kids from everyone with COIVD-19. It says if the kids have to be taken away, and the parent has COVID-19, make a note of that.

0
2

[–] glassuser 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Beat me to it.

5
-5

0
14

[–] cantaloupe6 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Notice the "and" it sounds like if sick parents are no longer able to care for kids.

If they have wuflu and are able to care it shouldn't apply.

It's excessive, in any case.

1
3

[–] BARBARA_ 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

If they have wuflu and are able to care it shouldn't apply.

It doesn't, and even if it DID, child services will almost always seek out kinship caregivers before foster care because then they don't need to provide gibs.

2
2

[–] 23670701? 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

I see you can't read kike. It literally says if they can't care and reiterates it again later that an alternative caregiver should be provided. Or you would prefer the kids just sit in shit and piss because their single mother is laying in bed hardly able to move.

0
1

[–] ALIENS2222 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No... Child sales services wants MONEY

1
-1

[–] RobertJHarsh 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

This is actually true. I have dealt with foster care in the past and they will exhaust searching for kin including to outside the state in order to prevent foster care and paying out the daily stipends. Each dollar that leaves the agency is not included in bonuses fpr management. Several states "outsource" their foster care systems to "not for (((PROFIT)))" agencies that are licensed to operate in the state. Those bonuses are based on leftover money. Back in the 80s and 90s agencies got bonuses from the state to yank kids out of homes. That has not stopped but has been seriously slowed down.

0
10

[–] ReadPastHeadlines 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

because their caregiver is infected with COVID-19 and is unable to support them

this important clarification may be the more reasonable reason for the code and form. like if they are dying because nurses are recklessly sticking them on a ventilator to get back to their tiktok dancing, they want a new code for tracking the reason that the kid needs to get foster care.

0
0

[–] ALIENS2222 ago 

Judged by whom...

0
0

[–] gazillions ago  (edited ago)

If you get any sickness and can not care for your kids, and have no one else to take care of them, the state has, does and will; until the money runs out. There's no reason to make special laws for covid so it's suspicious on that alone.

0
0

[–] ReadPastHeadlines ago 

its not a law they made. they have codes they use for reasons and they added a code for COVID-19. the new form for the added code is what this whole post is about.

2
3

[–] theBreadSultan 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

".... AND IS UNABLE TO SUPPORT THEM"

0
0

[–] altident ago  (edited ago)

And who makes that determination?

Suddenly we have a virus that causes less damage than influenza and some government crony has the right to come to your house and say whether or not you’re able to care for your kids?

2
-2

[–] theBreadSultan 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

There is no suddenly about it. The government has had the ability to take your kids if you are unable to support them for a very long time.

This is just about tracing the impact of covid on the care system

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] RobertJHarsh ago 

Looks like their is an email address.

0
1

[–] Tradesman 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'm willing to bet the process of getting them back is more hoops to jump through than Barnem and Bailey circus

0
1

[–] FoundingUncle 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is nothing new. Read the last paragraph. It says if you can not care for your kids (supervise, feed, bathe, etc. especially for little ones) they will provide an alternative. ANY TIME you can not care for your kids, CPS will take them.

Before they do this they will ask if you can care for them.

If you can not, can they care for themselves?

If not, are there relatives that can care for them?

If not, what do you suggest?

If a single mom had 3 kids under the age of 5 and she ends up in the hospital, what do your suggest?

load more comments ▼ (22 remaining)