[–] lorlipone 0 points 105 points (+105|-0) ago 

I delete at least 2/3 of the things I set out to post. Half way through "Fuck it - who cares anyway?" or "this is just going to start an argument I don't want to be bothered having." usually happen.

[–] tanukihat 0 points 46 points (+46|-0) ago 

this is just going to start an argument I don't want to be bothered having.

I feel a deep connection to this.

[–] gonight 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

Made that mistake yesterday. Expect all kinds of bullshit if you call out a shill or retard in this day and age. Like killing a wasp near its nest.

[–] watitdew 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

No you don't.

[–] NPCGator 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

As do I, I'd say it's about 1/2 for me.

[–] Xantha 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

fight me.

[–] bourbonexpert [S] 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

I think that’s one of the things that makes this website so great. The majority of the people here don’t give a fuck and they understand her time is more valuable than trying to get Internet points or win a completely useless debate.

[–] antiliberalsociety 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Account age and SCP/CCP levels help me to decide if it's worth it

[–] alele-opathic 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

However, that is the number one reason that the state of knowledge on this site has stopped evolving. People with something new to add begin to not care enough to comment.

[–] space_case 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Short and to the point? Why yes.

[–] rabiribi 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

"their time" or "his time" is the right word usage, not "her time". What kind of sentence is this, huh? Another cucked soyboys pussy worshipping? Or feminist virtue signaling?

[–] goforkyourself 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Same.

Either I come on way too strong, I know that the idiots here believe in their echo-chamber or I just go "fuck it, I don't care anymore".

[–] TXRepublicMovement 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

People are just meat robots running programs.

[–] majb 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I wrote a long response to some bullshit yahoo news article. Then I said fuck it - who cares anyway? I deleted everything and simply said something along the lines of "we all know who is in control of the insurance companies". Sometimes short and sweet is better than nothing.

[–] DeliciousOnions 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

All the damn time. Usually it's because I'm just repeating myself or overexplaining a concept to someone who likely doesn't care.

[–] Caesarkid1 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

overexplaining a concept to someone who likely doesn't care.

Or is incapable of understanding due to ideological reasons or mental impairment.

[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

-deleted-

[–] pcdude 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Usually to avoid doxxing myself

[–] not_saying_a_thing 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Same here. Long, thoughtful post and then I'll go all Death Note on it and away it goes. There's always something if someone is looking hard enough.

[–] Sanchez_Sucio 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

That's why I just delete my account every once in a while. It also helps that I am a nobody and all of my posts were shitty anyway.

[–] Derpfroot 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Honestly, I wonder what my work would do if I got doxxed. There's one guy that could fire me and he loathes the PC shit and stuff like calling someone's work to "tattle tale on them" to try and get them fired.

[–] waterniggas 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

if you don't do it during work hours they have no responsibility to take any action, unless you signed something additional

there isn't a single law against hiring racists

[–] space_case 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Wore my VOAT hoodie to workout at work one time. Instant dox the next week. RIP old accounts.

[–] theHubrisOfMan 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah all the time. The most common reasons for me are 1) when trying to make my point I realize my opinion is actually shit any not worth sharing or 2) I realize that the dialogues that’s to be had won’t bear any fruit or 3) I realize I actually don’t care about the topic and I’m arguing just to argue.

Self awareness is a beautiful thing.

[–] NosebergShekelman 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

ery day

[–] TheGrandMaster 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I'm proud of you, deleting text is very anti-semitic

[–] Apexbreed 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

He probably looks at it as an advanced form of censorship. Then pats himself on the back for a job well done.

[–] Questionable_1 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I do it all the time. I get my thought down then bam, something clicks and I say fuck it, fuck you, it's not worth my time and you won't give a shit anyway

[–] bourbonexpert [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Haha that’s the spirit!

[–] VicariousJambi 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I literally did that twice today.

I was gonna explain some things about usury and how jews love to fuck with the definitions of words, but decided if you're not already woke I can't do much to help you anymore.

[–] cleverbird 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's worth it to post entry level shit now and then. There's always new people that just woke up.

[–] beesmeesmonies 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier): Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death." Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age." Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording." Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death." Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim." Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth." Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people." Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them." Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts." Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves." Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night." Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated." Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl." Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible." Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces." Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples." Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy." Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations." Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it." Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122: "A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean." Nedarim 23b: "He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null'. His vows are then invalid." JEWS WILL TRY TO DENY THESE on their JEW website http://www.minuteswithmessiah.... * Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal." * Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed." THE JEW WILL USE 'SUBTERFUGE WORDING' but has no out on any of the above. Jews claim anti-semitism when they are proven racists themselves from their own book of cultural laws the talmud shown in part above!

[–] sane 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

@beesmeesmonies, You never heed comments back to you that teach you how to line space your posts after sentences!

You do not deserve upvotes when you keep ignoring the +10 rated educational replies showing you exactly HOW TO FIX YOUR POSTS. Read your replies! Fix your posts!

EXAMPLE showing your post repaired, and getting +10 instead of +0 :

https://voat.co/v/news/3213121/18551555

Follow the directions, or just use "source" voat feature button to copy and paste that repaired text.

Also, your LINK is broken, and link is fixed in the repaired example.

People will then read it.

load more comments ▼ (97 remaining)