I was just yesterday arguing with a colleague about the Nigerian Christian killings, and he completely denied it happening because the news comes from Breitbart, Neonnettle, etc., and he won't accept anything other than news straight from Nigeria or from 'approved' MSM media outlets. I eventually sent him an article in The Telegraph from 2018 pointing out the bloodshed going on between the two religions in Nigeria, so I managed to talk him into understanding that there was undoubtedly conflict in the area, but he refuses to believe, and is adamant that the '120 in the last 3 weeks' story didn't happen simply because of the source.
This question obviously extends to any other news actually, because I've come across this issue a lot when arguing with these people, where they simply won't accept something because of the source. Is there a way to fight this, or should I just hope and wait for the truth to come out in the MSM?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Yuke 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Here's one source - https://www.csw.org.uk/2019/03/14/press/4249/article.htm
Here's a second - https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2019/03/13/herdsmen-kill-85-people-in-kaduna-communities/
It seems to be predominatly the Fulani (muslim) who are killing others. The Adara are majority Christian. One of the articles gives a little more info on why this is happening..
And yes, there are many examples of this happening. Some places like wiki refer to them as "Herd-farmer conflicts" rather than what they really are.
[–] JustAnotherUser [S] ago
Brilliant, thanks for the info.