1
52

[–] YugeDick 1 points 52 points (+53|-1) ago 

Rule one when raising children: Don't reward bad behavior.

3
11

[–] Reverse-Flash 3 points 11 points (+14|-3) ago 

Rule #2: Don't let your sons wear dresses or makeup.

4
15

[–] Grand_Wizard 4 points 15 points (+19|-4) ago 

Rule #3: buy an INFOWARS.COM water filter to prevent homosexuality from spreading.

0
2

[–] Diebaumfrau 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Rule number one should be give your child a strong father.

0
0

[–] FlashLightMan 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

give? Are you a cuck?

1
0

[–] Nonchalant 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Same with having a girlfriend

1
32

[–] AndrewBlazeIt 1 points 32 points (+33|-1) ago 

We should start having straight pride parades

1
4

[–] revfelix 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

I'm in.

0
18

[–] AndrewBlazeIt 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

We can like.... Walk around and be aggressively wholesome at everyone

0
1

[–] Cat-hax 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Oh you can fucking bet they will shut it down before you even make it to the street.

1
1

[–] elitch2 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Stellar idea. WE can wear suits, and have bag pipe music, as we stoically march down Main Street.

2
0

[–] JerkSock 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

I am thinking khakis, polo shirts, and Tiki torches.

1
-1

[–] Schreiber 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

We need to start gay bashing like in good old times.

Force them to undergo correction procedure heh. Gotta just neuter them all and make all fags eunuch.

2
20

[–] Rabidfish88 2 points 20 points (+22|-2) ago 

Slippery slope doesn’t exist goyim.

I remember mentioning the slippery slope in a university class once and was pretty much laughed at. What now degenerates?

1
7

[–] gabara [S] 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Yep. Turns out there really was a gay agenda. Although it wasn't really the gays driving it.

16
-14

1
-1

[–] classy_nigger 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Its not that a "slippery slope" doesn't exist, its that its irrelevant.

If its right for gay people to be married then its right, entirely regardless of whatever that may imply. The "slippery slope" argument is fallacious because it looks at the logical conclusion of the argument and decides to reject it, because of the conclusion, without consideration of the argument.

1
11

[–] TheBuddha 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

That's kinda covered by the right to peacefully assemble and the right to expression. Getting people to trade away their rights while avoiding ending up in The Hague is a finer balancing act than just not watching the parade.

2
6

[–] gabara [S] 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago  (edited ago)

I'm just old enough to remember what it was originally about, the stone wall incident. And it worked and police harassment stopped. The current parade has no connection to it's roots. They even removed the "gay" part of the name since it offended the man-hating lesbians. It's now meaningless, but since it's about a specific demographic, it's now elitist and exclusionary and bad for the social fabric of society.

Can you tell I had a Red Bull for breakfast today? Blinking, that's when they get ya.

0
4

[–] TheBuddha 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

All those might be true but our Charter allows for peaceful assembly. (On my side of the line, our Constitution allows for that.)

I know this gabara, 'cause it was on the damned test. That test was a bitch, by the way. Most Canadians (I've seen numbers) couldn't pass it.

Canada does not have a right to assemble, to add to this. Canada has a right to peacefully assemble. It's on the goddamn test. You thinking it's meaningless (and you could be right) doesn't mean that they can't do it. Nowhere does it say, "peaceful assembly, but only if it's meaningful according to gabara."

That'd have been on the damned test!

1
5

[–] midnightblue1335 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Are massive public orgies of fags considered "peaceful assemblies"? Or are they horrific abominations displayed for the entire world, including your children? Did the Founders include "right to massive gay orgies in public" in the Constitution?

Idk about you guys, but I believe a neighborhood should be able to respond to these "parades" with violence, because they are dangerous, unsanitary, and potentially scarring to children (and adults). Maybe if these faggots just waved flags around and sung songs while fully-dressed, I could leave it go. But the sheer debauchery of this crap should be put to a stop with force if needed.

0
1

[–] Schreiber 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Agreed.

Fuck leftist trying to normalize perverse debauchery. Gay pride parade is more offensive to my eye than KKK parade.

0
1

[–] TheBuddha 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This is how you end up with memorable occasions such as the Kursk offensives.

1
0

[–] Martel-Sobieski 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

1) the hague has zero jurisdiction over the US. We never even ratified the Geneva conventions. The US isn't tied down by those "laws" they try to enforce as victors justice. Only way a US leader is getting tried at the Hague is if a foreign force invades and conquers the US, which is impossible because of the 300 million+ privately owned firearms.

2) it's not about their "right to peacefully assemble" when they're extremely indecent at the parades. You need permits to put on those things and permits are regularly denied. You're not allowed to throw a "parade" of a bunch of naked diseased dudes walking down the road in any other context except if you call it gay pride.

Preventing the parades doesn't violate their rights. Even when someone protests something they have to still follow decency laws or they get arrested and their protests are shut down.

"Lol just don't watch it guise"

No. That's not the point. The children dragged to this grt no say and dont know any better. Stop the bullshit. You know goddamn well what those things are about.

They don't care about your freedom of speech or freedom of expression.

The silver rule. Treat those as they would treat you. Fight against them doing that every way you can.

1
0

[–] TheBuddha 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I'm not sure why you'd bother responding. Try reading a bit more. It might help you out.

If you can't figure out why I'm treating you with disdain, go ahead and ask. I'll let you try to figure it out first.

1
0

[–] elitch2 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

These (((parades))) are an indecent affront to everything Western Civilization stands for. They require government permission, and are often publicly funded as well.

1
0

[–] Schreiber 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Here's a simple truth.

You can't support gay pride parades and not be responsible for white genocide.

There's a huge difference between tolerating faggots (don't ask don't tell) AND actively promoting faggotry and degenerate lifestyle through parades.

3
10

[–] fuckingmockies 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago 

They can call it marriage all they fucking want, but what they do is an abomination and a mockery of marriage.

2
0

[–] MoneyIsTiming 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

My sex ed consists of an electrical plug and socket, using a blender in the kitchen. I show them the plug end with male terminals and say its the male, then show them the plug and say its the female. I plug them in and say this is how babies are naturally made, while I place a baby in the blender and proceed to make babyshakes.

0
7

[–] markrod420 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

we should ostracise them as abnormal and weird and shame them back into their closets where they belong. i actually had no issue with gays until i realized the level of degeneracy that is working its way into our culture through the open door left behind by gay tolerance.

5
-3

[–] BreederBasher 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago 

Gays are never going back in the closet. If you try to push us there, we will re-open the concentration camps, shove you in, and gas you until none are left. Turnabout is fair play. Always has been, always will be.

The love that dare not speak its name will be silenced no more!

1
2

[–] markrod420 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha deep breath hahahahahahahahahahahahahHahahahahahahahaha

the 3.5% of the population that is the entire LGBT population couldnt even take over a single state, much less the country. just get back in the closet you fruit. most of us dont care what you do with your life, we just dont wanna hear about it. but if you want the more extreme among us to end up in charge then go ahead and keep talking the way you are. many of us dont mind your existence. but most of us probably arent going to be lifting a finger in your defense if you manage to incite the more extreme among us into tossing you off rooftops muslim style.

1
2

[–] looking4truth 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

You are the one whos going to get gassed like the good old days. And you limp wristed faggots are going to do nothing about it.

1
6

[–] peacegnome 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

There is no end goal for the left. There is nothing you can do to stop their childish behavior. If all the guns were controlled by the government, white straight people were exterminated, all healthcare (including cutting off of dicks, tattoos, piercings, etc.) was free, all school was free, all food was free, etc. they would still bitch about something. At that point though society would collapse in grand fashion, so i guess they would bitch about how they need straight white people back to fix things.

1
1

[–] midnightblue1335 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

SJWs and muslims are remarkably similar in this aspect- appeasing them might be the worst course of action, because they'll NEVER be satisfied no matter how much you give them.

0
0

[–] Schreiber 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's our responsibility to remove them from the gene pool.

People with leftist world view do not deserve to live.

0
0

[–] CMOT_Dibbler 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Removing themselves from the gene pool is kind of tied up in their way of life. No need to do the removing.

1
0

[–] 12299582? 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

At that point though society would collapse in grand fashion, so i guess they would bitch about how they need straight white people back to fix things.

Naw, they'd just bitch about how straight white people couldn't even make a functional society to accommodate their individual deviancies and then be glad that at least we are all dead.

0
2

[–] peacegnome 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

i was saying that they wouldn't have electricity, water, basic services, etc. at that point because of the collapse. similar to zimbabwe, and soon south africa.

2
6

[–] everef 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

No, we should take away gay marriage regardless, and ostracize homosexuals and other sexual deviants that are out of the closet.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] Tzitzimitl 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

just fashion a large phallic object out of tide pods and spraypaint it brown and they will take care of the rest

1
0

[–] everef 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

That is certainly a reliable way to kill the AIDS.

0
2

[–] racewest22 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Gay suicide hasn't gone down compared to when they were forced into the closet, so accepting their bad behavior hasn't help much...

0
4

[–] everef 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The acceptance of homosexuality, and consequently of hedonism in regard to sex, has had substantially harmful effects on our society which outweigh even the hypothetical benefits it might have to homosexuals and other sexual deviants.

1
2

[–] gabara [S] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I'm actually fine with this, so long as they are allowed to remain safe in that closet.

3
-3

[–] BreederBasher 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

Only homosexuality is normal so only gays should be allowed to marry. The Jewish God is God and if the Jewish God had wanted men and women to be together, then He would have made us the same.

0
1

[–] everef 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Source?

load more comments ▼ (22 remaining)