5
53

[–] Lordbananafist 5 points 53 points (+58|-5) ago 

because it benefits a parasite to remain incognito?

4
16

[–] ChippyTubes 4 points 16 points (+20|-4) ago  (edited ago)

Jews are not a race but a collection of tribes united under this idea for a state of israel or a collection of ethnicty, living with the Jewish religiosity connection....funnily enough they don't like Black Somali type Jews and don't want open borders. In the West for example through the centuries some of the Orthodox types were connected with smugling, degeneracy, subversion and smut but why the endless cycles of wealth and misery in history....a flea or tick can challenge no person on an open battle field, but what is the safest place....the safest place for example in the fighting animal kingdom jungle? The safest place is back of a Lion, the insects living on the back of a Lion have the safest most enjoyable life known.

0
14

[–] WilliamCutting 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Jews are most definately a race, Ashkenazi, Shepardic and Mizarazhi Jewish DNA exists and is detectable. I agree with what you are saying about them hiding in plain sight while being a parasite but stipulating there is no racial component is flat out wrong.

2
5

[–] Tallest_Skil 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

Jews are not a race

Confirmed for either paid shill or complete retard.

1
4

[–] lissencarak 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

But they are a race. As we see in genetic studies.

0
1

[–] SharpSliceOfMango 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's a religious thing. The Talmud says that 6 million need to perish by flames (holocaust) before the state of israel can be founded. This is why the jews faked the number of jewish WW2 victims from ~230.000 to 6 million. Before the WW2 "holocaust" the jews tried to produce a holocaust in Russia. The US news papers from that time also say "6 million jews" and this was 10-20 years before WW2.

5
-3

[–] Maroonsaint 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago 

This is why as a rapist I never invite friends or family over

[–] [deleted] 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

2
30

[–] CobraStallone 2 points 30 points (+32|-2) ago 

They have only had real power in the last 200-300 years.

2
41

[–] 12187253? 2 points 41 points (+43|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Correct, since about the time of Napolean. Rothschild heard of Napolean's defeat early, spread rumours that he had won, which crashed the British economy; he then bought everything himself, and then when the truth that Napolean had lost made its way to the British Isles, all stocks rose again -- and Rothschild owned it all.

Thus it was that his family gained control of Britain, the royalty not excluded, and from there went on to influence and mold the West throughout the 20th century. Federal Reserve cropped up in, what was it, 1913? That was another major win.

And here we are.

0
13

[–] mrgreenjeans9 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

and yet it's like enacting The Allegory of the Cave if you were to try and spread this perspective to the masses

1
4

[–] InfoTeddy 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

never knew this. care to redpill me on rothschild and napoleon and all that?

0
2

[–] whatisbestinlife 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

thats just as far as we need to go back for reference and context. the hebrews made an oath to never forgive the roman empire for destroying some temple. also im pretty sure charlemagne was terrible and they were behind him too

15
-15

0
5

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

However, control over a financial system and central banking still requires a large, functioning economy of PRODUCERS. These people still require a strong society on which to leech. They are so averse to physical labor themselves, they only survive as parasites. This is why they have never had the type of society the OP suggests, because they only subsist drinking the blood of established producers by usurping the banking systems, and eventually media and politics. Welcome to America.

0
5

[–] BeefBourgignon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Have you read anything by Miles Mathis? He exposes a lot of kikery in the British peerage by combing through the genealogy back into the 1700s and earlier.

1
3

[–] CobraStallone 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

No, but thank you for the recommendation.

0
2

[–] Schreiber 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Only possible because many whiteys succumbed to "feels" and many lost their survival instinct gene.

The moment when suddenly a bunch of whites think "hey guys, maybe slavery/colonialism is wrong," "women deserve more rights," and other progressive bullshit, that's when white people kinda asked for the whole white genocide thing.

Jews were merely complying, just like niggers, muslims, mexicans, and other non-whites.

0
0

[–] Juster 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Slavery was wrong. It was the original sin of the American colonies and one only has to imagine the heights America would have soared to had it not had to deal with the legacy of problems a foreign African population imported into a white nation inevitably caused. And every other group you mentioned have all argued for increased power by metaphorically connecting themselves to these enslaved blacks. Slavery has been a disaster for the white race, even though only a small fraction of whites ever practiced it.

7
12

[–] gabara 7 points 12 points (+19|-7) ago 

The original Jews are all dead. The ones today are fake jews. Bible says so in Revelation, The Synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews but are not. They're White People from Khazaria that have Neaderthal DNA.

1
24

[–] 12187262? 1 points 24 points (+25|-1) ago 

All races have Neanderthal DNA except for blacks.

5
5

[–] gabara 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago 

a reply from PS, oh crap so much pressure, come on Gabara get your shit together you can do this. This is your time to shine.

dey got cromag und Die Flintstonen. it's wha dems likes da fruity pebbles.

YES! nailed it

2
1

[–] Liber 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

But... The bible!

3
-2

[–] cyclops1771 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Neanderthal DNA is too high brow for black DNA?

2
3

[–] hifags18 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

they ain't white, I'm white

4
-2

[–] gabara 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago 

nigga you gey. you a gay lady gaylord gay for gay pay.

3
3

[–] fusir 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Khazar theory has been disproven. The are a particular family of germanic with some arab dna who through distant incest have preserved their particular family's relatively high IQ.

Imagine that there are different dna genotypes in Europe and some families are smarter than others. Think about every engineer and every inventor where every one of their family members are very smart. Half of Europe has above average intellegence (duh). You take just one of those families and lock it in and then you don't have to be averaged with the rest of the population and you look super smart. They are no smarter than smart Europeans because that's exactly what they are.

...plus Arab, plus they happen to be a particularly shitty family. Europe's had a few.

1
4

[–] gabara 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Then how do you explain all the 23andme.com data showing Jews were Khazarians. They had to appologize ad everything.

Hey @crensch, has the "khazar theory" been disproven or does fusir like lox on his bagel

1
3

[–] truthwoke33 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Sociopathy =/= supersmart

0
1

[–] hifags18 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

how come they look italian?

0
1

[–] Chimaira92 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I just posted this bit of info on Winston Churchill the other day.

The essential fact about Winston Churchill is that his mother's father was Leonard Jerome (formerly Jacobson, 1818-1891) a speculator and business partner of August Belmont (nee Schoenberg 1813-1890), who was Rothschild's main American representative.

Jennie Jerome's marriage to Randolph Churchill, the second son of the Duke of Marlborough appears to have been a marriage of convenience, typical of many unions between spendthrift English aristocrats and daughters of Jewish financiers.

 

and

"Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war," Churchill said," was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit."

(Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby, quoted in the Foreword, 2nd Ed. Sydney Rogerson, 'Propaganda in the Next War' 2001, orig. 1938.

7
2

[–] Maroonsaint 7 points 2 points (+9|-7) ago 

The Bible was written by Jews.

6
2

[–] gabara 6 points 2 points (+8|-6) ago 

It was all ripped off from the Egyptians. Horus is Jesus.

2
-1

[–] Tallest_Skil 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Confirmed for illiteracy.

7
-1

[–] Maroonsaint 7 points -1 points (+6|-7) ago 

No it wasn’t dumbass

1
5

[–] TheSeer 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

The Jewish Diaspora had both benefits and downsides. The benefit was in relation to trade, knowing prices in all the other trade centers before/better than everyone else. This was a significant advantage in merchant banking. The downside was having no homeland. But the problem is not with Jews, rather with Zionists and Kabbalists/occultists (many/most of which are of Jewish ethnicity/cultural background).

0
0

[–] Anson 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Then why do othordox Jews still get praise an acceptance from ethnic Jews? I'm pretty sure most people who dislike Jews don't distinguish between the two either. Why is that?

1
5

[–] ardvarcus 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Well, I think we know what the Jews would say: "We've been unfairly and mercilessly persecuted for 5600 years by every nation on the face of the Earth." For a little fun, ask them "Why?"

0
4

[–] ZX4jBXu 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Realistic answer was the land they believe they own was in control of the Ottoman Empire for hundreds and hundreds of years, the UK took it and held on to it and gave it to the Rothschilds in return for manipulating the US to enter WWI. With that land now effectively "owned" by Jewish banks it was just a matter of time before they could make their move to create the nation of Israel. That move was immediately apparent right after Germany surrendered and the plans were put into action.

Keep in mind the Jews have only had real history changing power since they created the Federal Reserve in 1913.

1
3

[–] Chimaira92 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Since everyone is throwing out their 2 cents. Here is mine.

They have only gained power through the use of Christianity.

http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/ebionites.html#Earliest

The first Christians were the Jews who believed that Jesus was the Jewish messiah. In his earliest work which mentions the Ebionites, Eusebius before 313CE writes that in a village called Choba, "there are Hebrews who believed in Christ, called Ebionites"3. They used an early Gospel of Matthew, and their beliefs are in accordance with the earliest reports of the gospels of Luke and Matthew, and with Jewish prophecy.

 

https://infogalactic.com/info/History_of_antisemitism#Occupational_and_other_restrictions

Restrictions upon Jewish occupations were imposed by Christian authorities. Local rulers and church officials closed many professions to Jews, pushing them into marginal roles considered socially inferior, such as tax and rent collecting and moneylending, occupations only tolerated as a "necessary evil". Catholic doctrine at the time held that lending money for interest was a sin, and it was an occupation forbidden to Christians. Not being subject to this restriction, insofar as loans to non-Jews were concerned, Jews made this business their own, despite possible criticism of usury in the Torah and later sections of the Hebrew Bible. Unfortunately, this led to many negative stereotypes of Jews as insolent, greedy usurers and the understandable tensions between creditors (typically Jews) and debtors (typically Christians) added to social, political, religious, and economic strains. Peasants who were forced to pay their taxes to Jews could see them as personally taking their money while unaware of those on whose behalf these Jews worked.

 

https://infogalactic.com/info/Sicut_Judaeis

Sicut Judaeis (Latin: "As the Jews") was a papal bull setting out the official position of the papacy regarding the treatment of Jews.

The first bull was issued in about 1120 by Calixtus II and was intended to protect Jews. It was prompted by the First Crusade, during which over five thousand Jews were slaughtered in Europe. The words sicut Judaeis ("and thus to the Jews") were first used by Pope Gregory I (590-604) in a letter addressed to the Bishop of Naples. Even then the Pope emphasized that Jews were entitled to "enjoy their lawful liberty."

The bull was reaffirmed by many popes including Alexander III, Celestine III (1191-1198), Innocent III (1199), Honorius III (1216), Gregory IX (1235), Innocent IV (1246), Alexander IV (1255), Urban IV (1262), Gregory X (1272 & 1274), Nicholas III, Martin IV (1281), Honorius IV (1285-1287), Nicholas IV (1288-92), Clement VI (1348), Urban V (1365), Boniface IX (1389), Martin V (1422), and Nicholas V (1447).

The bull forbade Christians, on pain of excommunication, from forcing Jews to convert, from harming them, from taking their property, from disturbing the celebration of their festivals, and from interfering with their cemeteries.

0
2

[–] Agile 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Because as mentioned in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion it says their one presumed weakness became their greatest strength. The ability to live all over the world feeding off every country and blending in

load more comments ▼ (25 remaining)