[–] CobraStallone 15 points 43 points (+58|-15) ago 

"I like pornography, but not this specific pornography which is not illegal, plz ban it, k?"

No, go fuck yourself, what the fuck are you even talking about?

[–] RageAgainstTheAmish 16 points 10 points (+26|-16) ago  (edited ago)

You do realize that Lolli porn normalizes pedophilia.

[–] CobraStallone 10 points 26 points (+36|-10) ago 

No, I don't. I'm undecided in the subject, but it could potentially reduce real life abuse by giving perverts an outlet, so I would rather discuss it like that, than cast moral judgements and leave at that. Introduce easy access to high quality porn videos to the Muslim world and I assure you rape rates would go down, simply because some people who were going to rape, are going to be too tired after jerking one off to do so. So I dunno, link me a study that says Japan with its libertine "loli" laws has a worse incidence of pederasty than the West and maybe you could convince me, making yourself feel morally smug by asking loaded questions with pre-assumed conclusions is no good. You are bad at this.

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

I dispute that with as much evidence as you present it with.

[–] talmoridor-x 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not an argument

[–] turbofaggot 17 points 2 points (+19|-17) ago 

He means it's hypocritical for one to support pornography, but only the types of pornography they prefer.

However, there should be ZERO tolerance for ANY sexual images of minors. That is NOT free speech. There is nothing political that can be conveyed, and nothing of value to be said. It is not a statement. Just get rid of it. Ban it.

When the new era of McCarthyism comes they will be glad to write a CNN headline members of "social media site that harbored child porn" taken into custody. Just outright ban it. No one gives a shit about it except for degenerates and predators. They need to go get psychiatric help, not come here.

[–] dontdoxxmefaggots 14 points 11 points (+25|-14) ago 

drawings aren't child porn

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

There is great irony in you calling for censorship in the same post in which you invoke McCarthyism.

[–] Merlynn 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

What if coming here is the only psychiatric help they can get?

[–] fusir 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

How would that test apply to regular pornography?

[–] TeranNotTerran 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago 

Who is "you"?

Have you heard of the back button?

[–] HarveyHarveyJones 5 points 4 points (+9|-5) ago 

The thing i noticed is the first nsfw page is always lolicon or some sort of variation of that. And it's always porn related. No nsfw subs that are not porn related. I never frequent random subs anyways but the few people who are new that try it out are probably shocked to see kiddie porn as a welcoming to voat.

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Why would you mark a non-porn subverse as NSFW?

I wonder what the numbers are on loli-esque vs non-loli-esque subverses. Might just be bad luck, or maybe there are lots compared to the normal porn subverses.

[–] srgmpdns 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No nsfw subs that are not porn related.

I've gotten a few gore-related NSFW subs.

[–] P8rtsUnkn0wn 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Maybe it's because those are more active than some of the others so it automatically goes to those ones first?

[–] ToFat2Fish 12 points 20 points (+32|-12) ago 

Go back to reddit.

[–] slwsnowman40 1 points 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

I'd be happy if the random links skipped the ones you've chosen to block.

[–] WakkoWarner 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This is a good suggestion IMO, if you have decided to block a sub the random subverse and random NSFW subverse should filter them out. After all if you don't like some content there is no reason it should be pushed on you.

[–] slwsnowman40 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It shouldn't be hard to implement that, it might make the page load a second or two slower depending on how many subs someone has blocked. They might not have done it due to limitations, but it should be "easy" to implement.

I say "easy" because I have no idea how the random feature works, it may not be easy.

[–] tanukihat 1 points 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

I'm curious what you mean, "cant fucking get back out of it without shutting everything down". You know that's not how websites work, right? You're not "in" a website such that they can tell when you're still "in" it. They log your initial visit but they don't time you. Close the website window immediately or leave it open for a week, it's the same initial visit log.

[–] BlackGrapeDrank 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Not necessarily true.

If a web site admin wants to know your activity on their web site, everything from your IP to the places you click to your scroll time and literally every action you take including the time on each page, tbis can be extracted and logged.

And even if the web admin doesn't have that functionality active in their local web site, ISPs and service providers up the chain can also extrsct that info.

[–] BlueDrache 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

I despise loli and shota as well, but it's not illegal in my area, so I don't give a fuck. Maybe how about a better solution.

How about "Random NSFW Subverse button obey user's blocklist when serving me porn."

[–] The_Prophets_Profit 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Reeks of common sense


beware shills

[–] spookybm 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

This slope is so slippery i done fell up the hill for a mile.

[–] goatsandbros 3 points 12 points (+15|-3) ago 

load more comments ▼ (28 remaining)