You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
42

[–] Corporal [S] 0 points 42 points (+42|-0) ago 

I posted this on v/ideasforvoat a week ago, but the constant crashing meant that a majority of people didn't see them.

So I wanted to crosspost it here, to help give it some more publicity!

So, whaddaya guys think?

0
14

[–] atthebottom77 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

I like them, and I like how the eyes change based on the type of "warning," but for someone like me that maybe clicking buttons quickly, it'd be nice to color the eyes to coincide with the type of warning to give an additional 'glance' type warning. Regardless, I think yes.

0
3

[–] DevilsAdvocado 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I'm with the general consensus here, these are great. I'm using the night mode on this thing so the spoilers text might be a little hard to read though.

0
1

[–] Knez 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I think the differences between the "nsfw" and "nsfl" logos are too small. The different eyes, font color and last letter could easily be missed when not paying attention or when viewing at low resolution or something.

My suggestion is to put at least 1 big difference in there, like moving one of the texts (either "nsfw" or "nsfl") to the left side of the goat, or more drastically changing one color (blue/yellow/green is not as alarming as red, but at least you immediately notice the difference), maybe even turning the dead goat upside down.

Also I vote to remove the "!", it just makes the icon look crowded. We already know something is going on because the goat is there, so to me it seem unnecessary as well.

0
0

[–] Piggywhiff 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You could just y'know, read it?

0
1

[–] j_ 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I like the concept. The actual images seem quite badly aliased — do you need vector source for the goat?