0
21

[–] 11790387 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Ahhh.... Middle East sand nigger religions. :) tools of control, every one of them. I bet we all sit here and fight about them in this thread. Glance... Yep! Sure do.

7
19

[–] UchihaMadara 7 points 19 points (+26|-7) ago 

christianity is a sand nigger religion too

1
3

[–] SyriansAreTerrorists 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Street shitters and slanty eyes are the only groups of people who invent somewhat peaceful religions. All other major groups' religions involve sacrificing kids, murdering infidels, and other sick shit.

1
3

[–] varialus 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

It's inspired by a sand nigger religions, but it was heavily adapted by the Romans and later by other Europeans. Modern Christianity isn't perfect but it's fundamentally different than other sand nigger religions.

2
2

[–] Lobotomy 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

And a great tool for the Jew to use on the goyim. It makes alliance with Judea really easy.

0
1

[–] 11793812 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

:) surely is. Talk to me about European religions.

0
1

[–] warrior88 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Most people praising muslims wouldn't dare set foot in one of their countries

0
1

[–] 11795067 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

And when they do they get raped to death.

3
-2

[–] 22jam22 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Christianity is born from those shit hole religions. Fucking jews ruin everything.

0
2

[–] HuginnOgMuninn 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not true. Old testament is not about the jews like they told you.

1
13

[–] Whitemail 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

This is why I don't believe in total freedom of religion anymore.

1
14

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Are you sure you ever did?

Freedom of religion was just empty, low-risk virtue signaling from an era where 99.99% of people were christians anyway and "religious freedom" meant worshipping by a different bible translation. If any of them ever lived in a multireligious society they would have been aware that allowing freedom of religon leads to perpetual conflict and occasionally bloodshed and you essentially have no freedom. You only can have freedom when you have no freedom of religion.

0
5

[–] MarcusA 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I dont think I can agree with this. Even within Christianity there are many sects, catholics, prodistants, baptists, orthodox, pentecostals, prespritarians, methodists, and others. (sp)

At different times these sects have had bloody wars. Persecution of Christians by other Christians was a real thing. Eben to this day, there is tremendous animosity.

The founders would have this history and my perspective is that they wanted to avoid the issue by not picking a national religion.

0
4

[–] Whitemail 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I never felt like any religion should be banned until I learned about Islam and the Talmud.

1
4

[–] fuckingmockies 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

This! In the context of the time, freedom of religion meant you could be a lutheran, or a baptist, or even a Catholic! The founding fathers never would have imagined mass migration would become possible - if they did, they would have written laws preventing immigration from non-whites.

0
1

[–] LazarusLong 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You only can have freedom when you have no freedom of religion.

That's some intense double think comrade!

0
7

[–] Lobotomy 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I believe in freedom FROM religion.

0
4

[–] RubberHammer 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Freedom of religion means the freedom to not observe religion.

0
1

[–] Whitworth 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Ok, but how is that any different than an SJW crying about freedom from being offended? When I see the phrase “freedom from religion” I assume it means that the someone would have to restrict the offensive religious thoughts from ever reaching the delicate senses of the protected class. Am I wrong, and if so how?

What would the perfect “freedom from religion” world look like? How would that world’s twitter treat an account that posts Jesus memes publicly? How would Reddit handle an unsavory thread where users start asking uncomfortable questions about the origins of morality? What does its German government do when someone publicly denies the accepted narrative of non-belief? In short, how does this utopia look any different than our current Jew controlled distopia but with different winners and losers?

3
12

[–] ZardoZ2017 3 points 12 points (+15|-3) ago 

I don't respect any religion derived from Abrahamism.

11
-4

1
8

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago  (edited ago)

urge them to lie, cheat, steal, and kill non-members of their faiths?

Isnt lying to, cheating, stealing from and killing non-members the whole point of a religion? In-group is the bestest ever, fuck the out-group. If you dont fight the outgroup, you dont need a religion.

A religion is an evolutionary survival and a memetical team-building strategy to protect your group from other groups. The fact that your nonsensical religion urges you to be a naive, gullible loser just means that your religion will not be around after a while.

Christianity only survived to this day because its members lied to each other and ignored the useless teachings of their founder, and instead bathed in the blood of their enemies and slaughtered and impaled them by the hundreds of thousands. As soon as christianity actually started adhering to the christ nonsense of turning the other cheek, it started disappearing.

And why do you even have the urge to "respect" members of other religions anyway? If they dont belong to your religion, theyre your enemies. "Respecting" them and refusing to fight them is treason.

0
2

[–] Justaddcoffee [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I’m not a Christian. I am an objectivist.

0
0

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

As I said, the fact that your nonsensical religion urges you to be a naive, gullible loser just means that your religion will be eaten alive by other, reality-based religions.

0
5

[–] unclassified 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Don't show them any respect and always be ready to defend yourself when engaged with any one of them. Better safe than sorry.

1
3

[–] fuckingmockies 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

How can anyone respect Christianity when it is an ideology from the same people? Do you not care about the ancient faiths and customs of your ancestors who were conquered by a Semitic religion?

0
3

[–] DeadBeatNigger 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You can't, that's literally why there's a campaign to force you into "tolerating" them. It's called tolerance for a reason, because whether you want to or not, you've gotta tolerate this shit just to make it through the day.

0
3

[–] TheTrigger 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Can you take a shit while jogging? I mean, yeah, sure.

load more comments ▼ (35 remaining)