You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] M4rt1n ago 

If you lived in a Nation that was below sea-level, would you prefer a National IQ of 110, where Engineers in the 115-132 range could ameliorate your risks with dykes or a nation which allowed mass immigration for 53 years and the National IQ was now 102-112 and the engineers who could properly design the Dykes had left because their Daughters kept getting raped on the way home from the schools that were being bombed?

0
1

[–] Thisismyvoatusername 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So you're saying girls walking home from school are at risk of being raped by dykes?

0
0

[–] JohnPaulJones ago  (edited ago)

I would prefer the most competent engineers which does tend to correlate strongly with IQ however I'm not designing dykes.
On the internet your IQ is meaningless.
The validity of an idea is not dependent on the IQ of the person presenting it.
Me claiming to have an IQ of X neither improves or diminishes the validity of arguments presented.

Back to your example. If a retard told you there was a crack in the dyke would you ignore them because they're retarded?

0
0

[–] M4rt1n ago 

I don't live in a flood plain because I'm not.

I'm not certain what the thrust of your questioning is or what your motivation is?

Seems like you're trying to convince me that countries like Pakistan with serious inbreeding problems resulting in sub-100 IQ average are just as capable as countries with a high median IQ?