0
43

[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 43 points (+43|-0) ago 

At least they've released the hundreds of hours of CCTV footage so we all now know without a doubt what really happened.

0
16

[–] partyboy 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

They should probably settle on a timeline first.

0
5

[–] Speakfreely 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Links or it didn't happen... I won't be waiting

0
5

[–] the_hidden_metric 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

He is being sarcastic, fucking obviously

1
5

[–] firex726 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

And tits

0
2

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Why would they? I certainly wouldn't. For what possible reason would they dump evidence on the internet when they're facing possibly the largest dollar total lawsuits in history? 50+ dead and 500 injured. Think anyone might file?

There are attorneys dying of dehydration from salivating over getting some of that action.

0
6

[–] Samsquamch 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

At some point it needs to be released to the public. The public were peacefully gathered at an outdoors event and were attacked from a pre-planned position with weapons purchased for the sole purpose of firing from an advantageous position. No, nothing should change regarding gun laws, but the public should be made aware how the attack was planned and how it happened.

0
1

[–] the_hidden_metric 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What could they possibly sue for? There is no legal obligation for anyone, even the police, to stop a mass shooting, or any other crime. Certainly the hotel and the concert promoters and property ownerd had no legal obligation to prevent or stop it, and you cant sue the government for being the victim of a crime. The SCOTUS already ruled the police are under no legal obligation to prevent crimes or even to help people while they are in the course of being victimized, and you cant sue them for it. You also cannot sue a gun manufacturer because someone used their product in a crime. No one has a case to sue because there is no sue-able party involved, footage or not, and any lawyer that does more than chase abulances would know that, so you're talking out of your ass. If anyone tried to sue anyone involved in this it would be tossed out by the first judge who skimmed the filing.

0
0

[–] KeksMex 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Nobody dead and nobody injured.

FTFY

1
-1

[–] maltespier 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

guys nobody needs to see this. OK, so it might help a struggling investigation get incredibly important eye witnesses to remember things over the week leading up to the attack to help establish a motive and whether he was seen with other people, but knowing so-called "motives" is not that big a deal. There's hardly anything worthwhile to see just a few grainy shots of nothing in particular.

0
1

[–] goblin_ghost 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Now that you mention it, I'm actually feeling kinda sleepy. Probably gonna go take a nap honestly, the whole thing's just a giant nothingburger.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 32 points (+33|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
7

[–] vastrightwing 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

The las vegas psy op was bungled so badly, they have to bury it. Thankfully the MSM is owned by the very agencies that executed las vegas. They simply stop mentioning las vegas at all. They will scrub the Internet and eventually the false flag won't ever have happened.

0
0

[–] the_hidden_metric 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A false flag is when a country fakes an attack that is blamed on an enemy as a pretext for war with that enemy. Las Vegas shooting does not fit into that category. Unless Trump is going to declare war on Boomers or something now, it wasn't a false flag.

5
-1

[–] Poot_McGarvey 5 points -1 points (+4|-5) ago 

source?

1
11

[–] WEHRMACHT_BITCHES_AT 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

The reality of lack of coverage

1
25

[–] con77 1 points 25 points (+26|-1) ago 

most of the country accepted a bullshit song and dance concerning the worst mass murder in US history

1
34

[–] KILLtheRATS 1 points 34 points (+35|-1) ago 

Nobody i have met believes the official story. Not even my 85 year old grandma

1
19

[–] Fahrvergnaked 1 points 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

I've noticed even the fucking normies can smell that something is off. It's very encouraging

1
5

[–] ThisIsMyRealName 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

She sounds like an expert.

0
7

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Who go shot? I didn't see anyone get shot...

2
8

[–] cyks 2 points 8 points (+10|-2) ago 

Relax goy, SEX IN HOLLYWOOD!!!!!

0
7

[–] HillBoulder 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I saw a video with what looked like some pretty real dead bodies piled around it was disturbingly life like. False flag with real deaths this time unlike Sandy Hook.

0
5

[–] EvilSeagull 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

The way to find out the truth is to get someone who works in the hospitals to talk.

1
0

[–] con77 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

neither did I

0
17

[–] ErnieTheEarner 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

It's none of our business "What Happens In Vegas Stays In Vegas".

0
15

[–] kevf4 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

My guess is that the motive didn't match the deep state's agenda. The motive was probably related to Antifa or Mossad. We will probably never know unless a civilian figures it out.

0
8

[–] tarnished_spoons 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

My understanding is the shooter may have been radicalized by ISIS while in the Philippines, and has some financial ties to three-letter government agencies that indicate he may have been working for the both of them. Could be proof of CIA growing and maintaining ISIS.

0
6

[–] Caesarkid1 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

He was obviously too lucky with gambling and he reacted how any white cisgendered male would. Still can't figure out how he used a bump-stock with a bipod though.

0
3

[–] FuckTheVirileAether 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah that's a strong possibility. Watch American Made, he might have been involved in something similar running guns to ISIS rebels, and he was even a pilot.

Maybe he wasn't very smart with the money he was being paid to facilitate terror and racked up a ton of normal debts on mortgages and gambling debts too, expecting the big government checks to keep coming in, and then when the funding for the programs got cut off under Trump he decided to slaughter people likely to be Trump supporters. Also possible that he used gambling at casinos to launder the money he received from CIA black budget.

Once you understand how crazy Hegelians think, government sponsored terror seems much more plausible. They think that evil is a condition for there being good, and the state creates a little terror group (or takes one over by bribing leaders or removing and replacing them) and controls it instead of letting a terror group organically develop outside of their control. By controlling the group they ensure that potential terrorist try to join the group first instead of acting on their own or starting another group, and they can be monitored and controlled so that they only do enough to justify the anti-terror budget. If you're a prospective terrorist butt hurt about something you're more likely to go join the evil group you've seen advertised already, just like any marketing. You're still a human and thus lazy and unlikely to do the work of starting your own group.

0
1

[–] NoBS 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The CIA is not growing ISIS, they are grooming useful idiots with or with out their knowledge.

0
12

[–] The_Red_Kraken 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Same happened in Quebec with the Mosque attack. A week later it was like it never happened.

0
6

[–] gazillions 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

50% did not care and 50% thought it was too convenient to the islamaphobia bullshit.

0
12

[–] Waiyu_Dudat 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Welcome to an Orwellian state.

0
10

[–] mudcatca 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Just another sequel: Operation Fast & Furious II

load more comments ▼ (35 remaining)