9
120

[–] sakuramboo 9 points 120 points (+129|-9) ago 

By definition it is. The reason for an action does not change the name of the action.

6
2

[–] markrod420 6 points 2 points (+8|-6) ago 

This is true. I have no issue with circumcision. However, you are correct.

0
1

[–] ThisIsntMe123 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This is correct, and a great way to stay on the fence.

1
0

[–] justsayingmayne 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

This specific action may be reversible - check out Foregen if you have the time :)

4
-3

[–] KarateCowboy 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

"Mutilation or maiming is an act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body."

Are you read to outlaw tattoos, earrings and any other piercing, or tacky hair die? How about those stupid ooga-booga earrings? I really hate those...

0
3

[–] pangaea 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I'd say restrict any permanent or otherwise long-term alteration to adults.

9
82

[–] middle_path 9 points 82 points (+91|-9) ago 

It's an absolutely abhorrent practice. I understand there may be times when a medical emergency calls for someone to have their foreskin removed, but to just to it to every American boy is criminal. I have son and I refused to do it, my wife was on the fence and I told her I'm not doing anything irreversible to my son. If he gets older and wants to do it for himself, he can go right ahead, but when almost every male in every other country is uncut and has zero issues - I see no reason to mutilate his junk and make it less sensitive for "health reasons".

I don't even understand how such a practice caught on in the USA. They take a newborn at about 24 hours, put sugar water in his mouth to distract him, then slice off his penis skin. How in the world did this become a common thing? It's child abuse and genital mutilation in every sense of the word.

I was robbed of my choice, and I decided I'm not taking that away from my son.

11
45

[–] BlueDrache 11 points 45 points (+56|-11) ago 

I don't even understand how such a practice caught on in the USA.

Jews.

It's a Jewish practice and the Christian faith is of Jewish descent.

4
25

[–] GuyIDisagreeWith 4 points 25 points (+29|-4) ago 

The story goes that while the Nazis were occupying Vienna a group of them happened upon a boy. They pointed their guns at the boy told him to pull his pants down. He was circumcised so they shot him for being a jew. Now every boy they can get their hands on is made an involuntary participant in their barbaric bronze age practices because the best place to hide a tree is in a forest.

1
7

[–] 10569789 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

No fedora tipper, it caught on because Jews convinced/infiltrated doctors.

0
3

[–] Saufsoldat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Masturbation prevention, actually.

1
2

[–] Razzoriel 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Half of the 10 most christian countries in the world have >20% circumcision rate. Out of the circuncised half,, three are in Africa, country with rampant sexual diseases (Nigeria, Congo and Ethiopia). Phillipines' circumcized males are around 20-80%, a very, very broad spectrum.

http://www.therichest.com/rich-list/the-biggest/the-10-most-christian-countries/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Global_Map_of_Male_Circumcision_Prevalence_by_Country.svg

12
17

[–] Muh-Shugana 12 points 17 points (+29|-12) ago 

I have a folder of circumcision info, I'll drop em off here.

What a lot of people don't know, is that circumcision is used regularly on bulls in order to make them less aggressive and easier to handle, it's a form of cattle control.

There is also a huge amount of nerves inside the hood itself so that sex becomes less satisfying, thus leading cut people to wanting more sex than is usual thus encouraging degeneracy

The thrill of doing sick shit is what people go after to fill the void of what normal sex would be like uncut.

pic 1

pic 2

pic 3

pic 4

pic 5

pic 6

Circumcision absolutely must be banned, we should make sure trump knows we want this shit gone.

1
16

[–] Uncle_Slob 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago 

circumcision is used regularly on bulls in order to make them less aggressive

I think someone is a little confused. Bulls do not have foreskin, the "member" is kept in a sheath. You are thinking of castration, which is used to make male farm animals less aggressive.

1
3

[–] BumbleTummy 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Tell me about it. My sensitivity is shit. I can go until sex turns to frustration.

0
2

[–] unclejimbo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wait, cut people want more sex, so that means cutting people would help or at least not hurt the white population decline?

3
0

[–] cansayfromexperience 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

You are full of shit and a retard. You can spew out whatever you want to say on the matter because people were either circumcised or not, and very few of us were uncircumcised until later in life.

I had to be circumcised for medical reasons, that if it hadn't been done I could've lost the whole organ. There is nothing at all fun about being circumcised later in life, and I can also tell you with absolute certainty that there was no "loss of sensitivity"

I'm so sick of reddit and voat sucking each other off over a subject they have no fucking clue they are talking about

3
8

[–] Cat-hax 3 points 8 points (+11|-3) ago 

Wish I could upvoat this to the top, I agree 100%, I wish I had the choice.

0
4

[–] WD_Pelley 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's an absolutely abhorrent practice. I understand there may be times when a medical emergency calls for someone to have their foreskin removed, but to just to it to every American boy is criminal. I have son and I refused to do it, my wife was on the fence and I told her I'm not doing anything irreversible to my son. If he gets older and wants to do it for himself, he can go right ahead, but when almost every male in every other country is uncut and has zero issues - I see no reason to mutilate his junk and make it less sensitive for "health reasons".

Exactly my view too. I don't like the fact that I was mutilated at birth and told to be grateful for it.

9
49

[–] WakkoWarner 9 points 49 points (+58|-9) ago 

Absolutely and it should be illegal. Your stupid superstitious believes are not an excuse to mutilate someone that can't defend himself.

0
10

[–] Dr_No 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Yeah, its like those africans with the huge lower lip or elongated necks, or chinese parents crushing their girls' feet. Barbaric!

0
2

[–] unclejimbo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It is absolutely an excuse, I think good reason is the word you want here.

[–] [deleted] 9 points 48 points (+57|-9) ago 

[Deleted]

4
10

[–] 22trilionAsecond 4 points 10 points (+14|-4) ago 

they don't want to know the truth. they are not yet stronger than their egos. they will not beadle to take on board info that proves them wrong

7
5

[–] Uncle_Slob 7 points 5 points (+12|-7) ago 

Cut here, sex is awesome.

I brought up a question a sex ed teacher couldn't answer. The pack of nerve ending in the glans is where the nerves are that indicate pleasure. If there is a hood going back and forth, then half of the time it is covering it up, like a condom. So wouldn't they get half as much pleasure? Uncut people tend to last longer, that would go against the argument that you get less sensitive. Wouldn't it?

1
11

[–] GuyIDisagreeWith 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

I don't know. I never will.

1
5

[–] KittenCat 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I don't know how true this is, but what I've heard is that because there are so many more nerves the guy is way more sensitive and can tell exactly how close he is to orgasm, so he's able to pace himself better to last longer.

Edit: Also, one of the functions of the foreskin is to cover and protect the glans. The glans of a circumcised penis, constantly rubbing against clothing and whatnot, becomes keratinized, and therefore less sensitive. You can easily see the difference if you look at the two heads side by side.

1
1

[–] PM_nudes_pls 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

My skin just goes down below the head when i fuck. Its protected bc im normal, it doesnt interfere at all.

2
-2

[–] ruck_feddit 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Yes.

1
4

[–] McFluffy 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

i am in the boat that to a baby it should not be done but should still be kept around for those 18+ that want it done.

1
1

[–] unclejimbo 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

So you crank up the color contrast to make the baby look more upset than a regular crying baby?

14
29

[–] PM_nudes_pls 14 points 29 points (+43|-14) ago 

One of my friends recently had a baby with her husband, and she didnt want circumcision for her child, while the husband did. It seems americans are, in general, brainwashed that circumcision is normal and should be done because everyone else does it. Another scam of the Jewish influence in the US.

0
8

[–] SexMachine 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Thanks to Kellogg for making it popular in America.

You see, the theory was that without foreskin, it would be harder for boys to jerk off, so they would jerk off less, and be less horny....

This is obviously false, but the practice is still performed as a "benefit" to health.

The thing is, we as people are cleaner than people 100 years ago, and the only health benefits that can be gained from it are also gained from taking a damn shower.

There's actually more risk to circumcision than leaving it alone.

Now I've seen a lot of fucking dick in my lifetime. More dick than any heterosexual man should ever see. I was in the infantry, so it's not gay, it's just infantry. I've seen more dicks that were mutilated from circumcision than I'd seen that had phimosis. Out of the hundred or so dicks I've seen, probably only 3 or 4 were fucked up from circumcision, but that's still too many.

22
-6

7
21

[–] greenfascist 7 points 21 points (+28|-7) ago 

anyone who cuts a babies junk shortly after they are born has something wrong with them.

evolution and/or god gave us everything we are born with for a reason.

only sick individuals would suggest that you should immediately cut up babies. western or not.

1
6

[–] McFluffy 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

evolution is not some perfect process where things evolve to the best possible form, infact most evolutions are terrible and its why most animals that were ever alive are now extinct.

that being said putting a baby into shock from pain by cutting its junk is also terrible. if they want it at 18 they can get it then.

1
6

[–] greenfascist 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago  (edited ago)

evolution is not some perfect process where things evolve to the best possible form

you are confused. there is no such thing as 'the best possible form', so your basic premise is flawed. There is an idea of 'fitness landscapes', and evolution is the primrary process which adapts to changing fitness landscapes by evolution through natural selection.

infact most evolutions are terrible and its why most animals that were ever alive are now extinct.

evolution doesn't get to have terms like 'terrible' associated with it. It's a non-random process which selects for fitness to the environment of the living thing. animals that were alive were selected for naturally for the fitness landscape they inhabited. The average lifespan of a species is relatively short. Somewhere on the order of a few hundred thousand years.

Humans don't hold a candle to crocodiles, pronghorn antelope, and many others.

If you look into the likely selective pressures that caused foreskin to evolve, I suspect you will find it plays a beneficial role in immunology, amongst others.

http://www.noharmm.org/advantage.htm

0
0

[–] shrink 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The vast majority of traits and features that any animal has are positively selected for by evolution. The few things that are not are generated by genetic drift. The foreskin exists for a reason, as with most things that compose you as a human.

0
2

[–] HorseIsDead 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

My mom violently support circumcision, is a libtard, and had me cut obviously. Can confirm something is seriously fucking wrong with her.

0
0

[–] KarateCowboy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

evolution and/or god gave us everything we are born with for a reason.

Uhhh, "reason"? Yes. Meaningful use? Absolutely not. Just look at the appendix.

only sick individuals would suggest that you should immediately cut up babies

Ummmm, you mean like the umbilical chord? Belly buttons? Maybe we should just leave them attached to the mother?

0
0

[–] greenfascist 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Uhhh, "reason"? Yes. Meaningful use? Absolutely not. Just look at the appendix.

reason = higher adaptability on the fitness landscape moron.

Ummmm, you mean like the umbilical chord? Belly buttons? Maybe we should just leave them attached to the mother?

I know it's hard to imagine that the umbilical cord falls off naturally without intervention. But it does. For reals.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] greenfascist 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Evolution gave us wisdom teeth that don't even fit in our skulls because our jaws are shrinking while our heads are growing so large

we used to have advantages from those teeth. In the absence of dental surgery and antibiotics, wisdom teeth would probably have died out by now.

and our women's hips so small that more and more often we're having to perform caesareans to birth people.

by offering surgery to women to give birth we are keeping these genes in the population. evolution requires death from bad genes.

9
19

[–] iswallow 9 points 19 points (+28|-9) ago  (edited ago)

medical reason == circumcision

non-medical reason == genital mutilation

5
16

[–] prairie 5 points 16 points (+21|-5) ago 

medical reason == very rare

13
4

[–] Uncle_Slob 13 points 4 points (+17|-13) ago 

There is some evidence that circumcision has health benefits, including:

A decreased risk of urinary tract infections.

A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men.

Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners.

Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin).

Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location).

http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/guide/circumcision

http://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/circumcision/basics/why-its-done/PRC-20013585

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684945/

1
3

[–] HorseIsDead 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

We really need to kill the kikes who are spreading the idea that "circumcision is good to do because it saves countries healthcare costs in the future from STDs"

OK, I'm going to start removing what will turn into future breast tissue in infant girls, that should help prevent breast cancer. But it's ok because long term it'll save a few million dollars in an economy with a several trillion dollar GDP, right??

0
0

[–] weezkitty 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I was circumcised for a medical reason. My parents had no plan to do the procedure except after repeated chronic infection

3
13

[–] common_sense 3 points 13 points (+16|-3) ago 

I'm cut and I think that it's inhumane.

8
3

[–] ruck_feddit 8 points 3 points (+11|-8) ago 

I'm cut and I feel the opposite. Although, I didn't have a rabbi sucking on my infant cock when the procedure was done.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] Octoclops 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Although, I didn't have a rabbi sucking on my infant cock when the procedure was done.

I guess your rabbi is straight then.

load more comments ▼ (76 remaining)