You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The media practically showered BLM with positive appraisal. Of course all lives matter, but that's not what they want to brainwash their viewers into thinking. This is because BLM and the media work for the same masters. It's like nepotism.
[–]HighEnergyLife0 points
4 points
4 points
(+4|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Read Peter Thiels book The Diversity Myth.
The oppressed/subordinate/victim groups have always been beyond reproach, since the beginning.
Edit:
Pg:165.
"Although Stanford's code seemed to prohibit all vilification on the basis of sex, race, and these other characteristics, there was a catch. Only epithets targeted at so-called “subordinated” groups were considered “fighting words.” Those with a “superordinate” role in society were not protected. For these individuals, explained law professor Charles Lawrence, a supporter of the speech code, there were no “fighting words” in the English language that would “inflict injury.”4 In other words, those who were superordinate were so dominant that, by definition, they could never be hurt by others, and those who were subordinate were so powerless that they could never hurt others."
This all started because a couple white student told a couple black students that Mozart wasn't black
They did get outraged. They invited BLM agitators on to their shows to tell them how racist it is, and they all shared their outrage in a feminine way about how racist "All Lives Matters" is.
[–]lanre0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I'm convinced at this point that the FBI infiltrated BLM like they do all other groups and helped the more radical/retarded members rise to positions of power. As we saw at Charlotte, Berkeley, etc. the police aren't on the side of whites any more than they are of blacks, and it could've morphed into a second civil rights movement against the police state.
[Edit:] And yeah, the media won't get outraged until their handlers tell them to.
You're seriously asking this question? Well, I'll answer it for you. Because the media are biased. They are almost wholly in support of anything leftist, and are almost wholly against anything white.
Not part of the narrative you know that. The media sucks blm cocks whenever they can and being a nigger and hating white people is treated as a novelty.
Sort: Top
[–] 8Ball 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
The media practically showered BLM with positive appraisal. Of course all lives matter, but that's not what they want to brainwash their viewers into thinking. This is because BLM and the media work for the same masters. It's like nepotism.
[–] weezkitty 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I feel like the lives of BLM don't matter.
[–] HighEnergyLife 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Read Peter Thiels book The Diversity Myth.
The oppressed/subordinate/victim groups have always been beyond reproach, since the beginning.
Edit: Pg:165.
"Although Stanford's code seemed to prohibit all vilification on the basis of sex, race, and these other characteristics, there was a catch. Only epithets targeted at so-called “subordinated” groups were considered “fighting words.” Those with a “superordinate” role in society were not protected. For these individuals, explained law professor Charles Lawrence, a supporter of the speech code, there were no “fighting words” in the English language that would “inflict injury.”4 In other words, those who were superordinate were so dominant that, by definition, they could never be hurt by others, and those who were subordinate were so powerless that they could never hurt others."
This all started because a couple white student told a couple black students that Mozart wasn't black
[–] lemon11 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
They did get outraged. They invited BLM agitators on to their shows to tell them how racist it is, and they all shared their outrage in a feminine way about how racist "All Lives Matters" is.
[–] dontforgetaboutevil 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Because they work for the same people.
[–] lanre 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I'm convinced at this point that the FBI infiltrated BLM like they do all other groups and helped the more radical/retarded members rise to positions of power. As we saw at Charlotte, Berkeley, etc. the police aren't on the side of whites any more than they are of blacks, and it could've morphed into a second civil rights movement against the police state.
[Edit:] And yeah, the media won't get outraged until their handlers tell them to.
[–] NeoGoat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes! If they had embraced whites, it could have been a beneficial civil rights movement.
[–] ardvarcus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You're seriously asking this question? Well, I'll answer it for you. Because the media are biased. They are almost wholly in support of anything leftist, and are almost wholly against anything white.
[–] ScalarWhaler 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You know the answer. This is real and happening.
[–] aria_taint ago
Not part of the narrative you know that. The media sucks blm cocks whenever they can and being a nigger and hating white people is treated as a novelty.