You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

17
54

[–] dkyuss 17 points 54 points (+71|-17) ago  (edited ago)

Specifically we are talking of WTC 7 that was not hit by planes. No jet fuel.

Memory refresh https://youtu.be/nc9Xad6ooPo?t=25s

Now try again.

17
8

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 17 points 8 points (+25|-17) ago 

It was hit by debris and was engulfed in flames for hours. An entire face of the building was missing. (Which, by the way, destroys the theory that the WTC "collapsed in on itself." Massive debris were thrown everywhere by both the collisions and collapses.)

[–] [deleted] 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
1

[–] UlyssesEMcGill 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

entire face of the building was missing


entire

Entire?

0
0

[–] dkyuss 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

https://youtu.be/nc9Xad6ooPo?t=25s

A fire did this? Even if severely damage from debris from the towers falling on it, I dont believe it.

1
-1

[–] UlyssesEMcGill 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Why not edit this false comment instead of linking me to another comment saying it's false.

Do you get a citation if you edit too many comments?

Edit: italicized word added

8
7

[–] Synthicide 8 points 7 points (+15|-8) ago  (edited ago)

Maybe WTC 7 collapsed because it was bombarded with giants chunks of a colossal building falling on it.

1
4

[–] laserpewpewpewpew 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

The only building located on a different block. It's literally across the street and there is another building in between and the post office and Verizon store were all good, but building 7 collapses.

http://www.wtc7.net/location.html and you'll see how nicely the blue area only was what had damage.

2
1

[–] CapinBoredface 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

no no no no that cant be right. It must have been the jews

0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Except we know it had virtually zero damage. Shill harder.

4
0

[–] o0shad0o 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago  (edited ago)

The reason WTC 7 failed from the bottom is almost half of the bottom two ten floors was a giant room containing an electrical substation, backup generators and diesel fuel tanks to run them.

24
-10

[–] NotAnOctopus 24 points -10 points (+14|-24) ago 

Where in his reply did did he say anything about jet fuel? Sorry but his answer is spot on.

Now try again.

3
20

[–] trancedj 3 points 20 points (+23|-3) ago 

Can you read? He's clearly talking about WTC buildings 1 & 2. He also mentions jet fuel in the second paragraph. OP is discussing WTC 7.

Now try again.

2
3

[–] elitch2 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Again, because of the buildings' design, when one floor collapsed, the weight of the building was transferred to the other floors, which were also being weakened by the burning jet fuel.

Right fucking there. Can you read, faggot?