You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 26 points 51 points (+77|-26) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

7
29

[–] 9513006? 7 points 29 points (+36|-7) ago  (edited ago)

That third plane was likely flight 93, and it was shot down because the pilots managed to regain control from the low-jacked computer system.

The explosives/thermite was likely supposed to be set off just after the crash, but since it wasn't coming they had to do it anyway or be discovered.

2
18

[–] alele-opathic 2 points 18 points (+20|-2) ago  (edited ago)

From @gabara:

A third plane was supposed to hit it, but the passengers stopped them.

From @DeportGarbage:

it was shot down because the pilots managed to regain control from the low-jacked computer system.

This is an important distinction to be made - the plane's "wreckage" had none of the signatures of typical wreckage, namely mangled body panels, or any of the structure of the craft. IIRC, part of a single turbine impeller was the largest thing recovered from the "crash" site. Though the plane was shot down in the middle of nowhere in PA, at least two locals report the sound of a loud explosion followed by an unmarked white fighter leaving in the area. One report was by an old Vietnam War vet.

The 'hero story' was hastily invented after the fact, and is also very easily (pardon the pun) shot down with just a little research.

It's hard to find information on the event given that so many of the old websites keeping track of this stuff have shut down over the years. The old Dave McGowan site was a treasure trove for this, but he suddenly contracted late stage lung cancer and died at 55.

 

Keep your wits about you gents, something about this topic has brought out all the bots and shills. Remember to check account ages and post histories.

1
-1

[–] 9515955? 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Explain Daniel Lewin being on 93. I know why. I want to see what to think

7
-4

[–] 9-11 7 points -4 points (+3|-7) ago 

The explosives/thermite was likely supposed to be set off just after the crash

You are an idiot. What people fail to see about these 9/11 truthers is that you are all leftists at heart, and muslim sympathizers. You would rather have people believe that Pres Bush (a fucking WHITE MALE) murdered 3,000 americans on that faithful day instead of your beloved arab muslim jihadists who you claim dindu nuffin'. In fact, you go to great lengths to twist uncontested facts and obfuscate the mountain of forensic evidence that outright contradicts your retarded theories. If your general tone wasn't so anti-white and anti-western I'd let it pass, but we know any right leaning or conservative skeptics moved on long ago.

5
13

[–] Empress 5 points 13 points (+18|-5) ago 

^

15
-12

[–] Trash_Panda 15 points -12 points (+3|-15) ago 

v

0
4

[–] Moose_of_Reason 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

People (normies) are too afraid to admit this to themselves.

0
1

[–] TAThatBoomerang 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's quite simple to understand that it was controlled demolition. The WTC was falling at almost exactly freefall speeds. This is only possible if the lower parts of the building was destroyed (presumably via explosives of some sort). If it was a natural collapse, the collapse would be significantly slower (or even not made possible) because of the tons upon tons of structure underneath the burning segment that's holding it up.