You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
50

[–] Kadynce 2 points 50 points (+52|-2) ago 

This isnt censorship, this is banning illegal stuff. There is a difference. -_- It seems like people here don't understand this.

1
5

[–] Caboose_Calloway 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

They understand it alright. This is an operation to defame and discredit Voat.

0
3

[–] Kadynce 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You are 100% right.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
5

[–] whatthehelldamnguy 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Actually it isn't illegal, just incredibly immoral, and close enough to illegal that you would have to fight it out in court if someone with a lot of money and an axe to grind. I don't get anything out of it being here so I don't care. I know it is a slippery slope but I really think it had to be done to stay alive and afloat.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] LittleBunnyFeeFee 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I also don't see them offering to pay for Voat's legal fees. This was a necessary step to keep the site running. It's ridiculous to expect Voat to keep illegal content in the name of "free speech".

1
-1

[–] obriets34 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

naked pics of children in sexual situations is illegal.

posting a pic of someone clothed in public isn't illegal.

you faggot social justice warriors basically want to change the law to read "anything that OFFENDS ME is illegal"

by your retarded definition, this bitch dancing in public is creating child porn

0
2

[–] Skwerley 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I never thought I'd be the one to propagate this idea but a lot of the people voting here seem to be of the hivemind. It seems the vacuum was filled with both sides of the shitty reddit coin.

0
0

[–] obriets34 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago