0
5

[–] Frenchgeek 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

After the war on terror you have some freedom left?!

0
0

[–] Never_Over 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

obama promised to end it, lol

0
2

[–] Holonomic 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The war, or freedom?

0
1

[–] Ex-Redditor [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

the apple/s do not fall from the tree

0
1

[–] leavethebag 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

They've already been accepted into the higher class. They'll never have to work a day in their lives. Though I hope one we can see him tried as a criminal

0
0

[–] newoldwave 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I'll give up my freedoms when Obama goes back to work on the plantation.

0
0

[–] mamwad 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Trump 2016! He will preserve your freedom to be stopped and searched by police without probable cause!

0
0

[–] Grind_Goddess 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Since when is it illegal to twerk?

0
0

[–] pissed 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I didn't know it was against the law to twerk. As for weed, to make it nationally legal involves a lot of political bullshit so leave it to the states (isn't it legal in DC?).

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Thomas_Crown 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I hate this post... everything about it is deplorable and nonsensical.

[–] [deleted] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] CrazyInAnInsaneWorld 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's still illegal under Federal law, and we've already established that Obama has absolutely no problem raiding dispensaries under Federal law with the DEA.

The point is to have some damned consistency. Equality under the law means EVERYONE, from the child of a homeless gutter-whore to the children of the Commander in Chief are held to the same standards. If Obama doesn't want his daughters tried under Federal law for something that is quite clearly a crime (Possession of a Schedule 1 Controlled Substance), then that's all the more reason why he should oppose the Controlled Substance Act alongside the rest of the folks that do, instead of just relying on the DOJ to not prosecute them out of nepotism in contradiction to the law.

Of course, in your eyes, demanding the Elites submit to the same rules as the rest of us, when it's literally written into the legal foundations of this country, is just SO OLD FASHIONED and little more than other outdated traditional values like Freedom of Speech/Religion/Press (1st Amendment) and the Right to Due Process (5th Amendment), huh? After all, it's just Equal Enforcement of the Law (14th Amendment), right?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]
load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)