0
33

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

Diversity is code for subvert and replace. Everytime a leader claims they want diversity that usually means they want a new electorate that will accept low wages and welfare and never question the lack of social mobility. After 2008 crash and the rise of the occupy movement, governments decided we needed some 'diversity' less we organize and revolt enmasse.

0
4

[–] primaryappellation 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

True, before it was co-opted, the most effective members of the occupy movement were white men.

0
1

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The occupy movement was not co-opted and was effectively leaderless. It was systematically dismantled specifically because it was diverse multiheaded hydra and was a danger to divisionary politics.

1
14

[–] tafkatruke 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Race is purely a social construct. It was invented by the non-existent whites as an excuse to discriminate against others. When a Social Justice Advocate discusses race, they are using the language of the White Oppressive Patriarchy that is understandable to the drones and thralls of the Patriarchy. What the activist really means is cultures and cultural differences, but the activist knows that they must use the language of the Oppressive White het cis Racist Overlords to communicate with the average person with unchecked privilege.

We are all about tolerance, acceptance, cultural awareness without appropriation, and an end to racism, sexism, and homophobia. These are noble ideals, so anyone opposing them is a white male het cissy deserving of contempt, ridicule, public shaming, and financial ruin.

0
8

[–] TheodoreKent 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Lol! Fucking Hilarious.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
5

[–] tafkatruke 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Neckbeard shitlord cissy, you'll rue this day when Millennials United for Feminism and Fairness take over. Prepare to be smothered by MUFF!

0
10

[–] bob3333 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Not only that, but if everyone is equal what difference does it make if a place is 100% black or 100% white?

0
4

[–] DependasaurusRex 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Less violence and welfare reliance, but hey, what do statistics really mean?

0
5

[–] qpwt 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Ok I'll bite. Race strongly correlates with culture and identity. In a racially homogeneous "place" the inhabitants are limited by the culture of their race, thereby rendering them ignorant. Ignorance, while blissful, often leads to degradation of society.

Diversity, in the fictional sense that I've now constructed, aims to combat cultural ignorance in places where only one or two races exist through an artificial influx of different races, thereby exposing the existing inhabitants to different cultures and raising overall awareness.

There. Total bullshit that I just made up but it almost sounds good.

0
4

[–] novictim 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The question answers itself. I don't accept the notion of "race". We should not seek "Diversity" at all. It is a misguided goal based on misconceptions of what the USA is actually built upon: Post Enlightenment Ethics, patriotism, and citizenship.

We are not a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of Citizens.

Because the idea of "race" is a false one, we are not made more "diverse" by bringing in people we assign as being of a different "race". What "different race" means in reality is that we are talking about people who come with a different and often incompatible set of values. That type of "diversity" is not a strength but a recipe for civil strife. "Race" usually just means that a different ethnicity is being imported and what we get is WEAKNESS through the fracturing of our national identity.

What we get is a mix of incompatible cultures and the resulting tensions as some of the these cultures, many of which are APPALLING, compete for dominance rather than assimilation. That is the reality of our current misguided notions of encouraging diversity.

It used to be the goal of immigration to assimilate new peoples and we should return to that notion again. And when we identify groups that refuse to assimilate to the Western Ethic then we should recognize this and stop such people from continuing to come.

This is COMMON SENSE 101. Melting Pot = Assimilation. This has to be the goal.

The best that we can hope for in importing immigrants is that these imported cultures will then acculturate to the normative American culture and become patriotic and hard working Americans. We need to state that as the goal and monitor whether that happens. We need to push back against those that say otherwise. But hell, the groups that promote this immigration (often self referring as "progressive") don't want these imported people to acculturate. They see it as a "plus" that we have imported communities that fail to learn English and that continues to maintain a primary identity that is not American even in the second and third generation.

So if the "melting pot" is the best we can hope for, we had better actually need the extra labour from these immigrants before we let them in. Low levels of unemployment (<2%) should be one of the criteria. Immigration should be contingent on there being a need by the USA (not on the needs of the would-be immigrant).

One last thing:

The notion of "race" goes hand in hand with what we call racism. That should be obvious. And "racism" is used to circumvent the moral notion of individuality and personal responsibility for the purpose of assigning entitlements and disadvantages based on skin colour. The primary manifestation of racism today is in the systemic racism whereby so-called Native Americans and so-called African Americans and Hispanics are given preferential treatment on the basis of their supposed inherited disadvantage or inherited entitlements. These benefits necessarily come at the expense of the wider society. Thus, racial based benefits are immoral. They represent a great wrong and are founded on a false argument of racial guilt and racial entitlement. We need to stop this.

Racism of this kind, or any other kind, is a form of COLLECTIVISM. The use of this tool of "Racial Collectivism" is popularly called Identity Politics. We need to reject such collectivism as it violates the highest ideals of the Enlightenment and the Western Ethos.

0
4

[–] gazillions 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You can't reason with insanity. You simply can't. Liberals that spew that shit are insane.

0
3

[–] alalzia 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Different race does not mean different culture and same race does not mean same culture .

0
3

[–] Ar1 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Because it's racist to ask someone what race they are, but it's racist to say you're colorblind.

1
0

[–] mispelledsomething 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You dropped this: \

load more comments ▼ (11 remaining)